The recent furor over the 18 percent preferential interest rate for retired military personnel, public servants and public school teachers has been very divisive. Many people who do not fully understand the situation would prefer that the pan-blue and pan-green camps stop their incessant wrangling over issues like this one.
In fact, this issue has little to do with pan-blue or pan-green politics and nothing to do with the struggle between pro-unification and pro-independence elements. This is a serious issue involving social justice and fairness, intimately related to the everyday lives of ordinary people.
Despite the fact that Taiwan has been regarded as a free, democratic country ever since the first direct presidential elections in 1996, one should bear in mind that it is still just a fledgling democracy. We believe that the consolidation of Taiwanese democracy can be divided into two stages.
The first of these is the establishment of a political system capable of maintaining the freedom and human rights of the individual and the second is the creation of a society based on the rule of law and founded on the principles of fairness and justice.
During these stages, all of the fighting between the so-called pan-blue and pan-green camps, and what many perceive as political clashes are, in fact, necessary evils in the process of striving for fairness and justice.
Concrete examples of this can be seen in the debates over the 18 percent preferential interest rate, the seniority debate resulting from allowing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials to add the years served as a party official to their years served as a civil servant, the second-generation health insurance and amendments to tax law resulting in the removal of the tax exemption for military personnel and teachers. Of these, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) argued most vigorously about the inherent unfairness of the seniority issue.
In fact, we are not opposed to giving the same retirement benefits civil servants receive to KMT officials who worked under the former party-state system.
Given the special background of that time, KMT employees simply did not know that their career choice was any difference from that of a civil servant. What would they do if they were now not given retirement benefits?
However, the party should pay for those benefits by selling its assets. If it is still unable to cover all the expenses after doing so, then perhaps the government could cover the rest.
By taking sentiment, reason and law into consideration, we believe that this is a more appropriate method for resolving the problem fairly and justly.
Lastly, we must say that all disputes should be finally decided based on the consideration of building a fair and just society. The key to the problem lies in systematic reform. This is in line with the neutral definition of “democratic consolidation” proposed by Andreas Schedler, an academic studying democratization: “organizational democracy,” or, in other words, the systemization of democracy.
To sum up, Taiwan’s democratization must, on the one hand, maintain our free democratic system, while, on the other hand, it requires that we all use our own freedom and rights to create a society of rule of law based on the principle of fairness and justice. The most important examination standard in this process is to make sure that different people and different parties behave in the same way and receive the same treatment.
Lee Yeau-tarn is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Development Studies at National Chengchi University; Hsu Heng-chen is a doctoral student in the Department of Political Science at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER AND EDDY CHANG
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS