Out of place criticism
Reading Callum McGovern’s letters (Letters, Jan. 9 and Jan. 21, page 8), I wonder if he was living in or talking about the same country I am living in.
Generalizing one’s own experience is always a dangerous thing. I have been in Taiwan on and off since 1983 and have lived here for the past 15 years. Not once have I experienced racism. My wife is Indonesian and does not speak Chinese or Taiwanese. She loves it here and says people here are very friendly, kind and helpful. We live in Kaohsiung, where the “light-skinned mainland Chinese” are in short supply, which might be part of the explanation. While we are stigmatizing and throwing prejudices around, he talks of politicians, but when were they ever human?
I have known several foreign workers here in Taiwan. None has any problem with the Taiwanese in general. The harshest, and in that respect the most racist, treatment they ever got was always from their employers.
Have you seen how workers, even Taiwanese ones, are treated at small companies or even multinationals such as McDonalds. That is not racism; it is exploitation pure and simple.
Having lived and worked on three continents, I settled in Taiwan because of its people. People here are kind, open-minded, always ready to help. As to their English ability, the first time I came here, 1983, I did not speak a single word of Chinese and to my surprise, wherever I went I found people that spoke English.
When was it ever the case that one could get by with English in Germany or France? Try to find someone that speaks English in any other place other than a major tourist stop. It’s impossible. Nine years ago I landed at Nurenberg Airport, an international terminal in Germany. Not a single person I spoke to there spoke English.
I have to disappoint McGovern when he states that English is the most widely spoken language on earth. Wrong! Chinese is. Check your facts. Only about 1 billion people speak English. Only 300 million are native speakers and their numbers are declining. Add Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore to all the Mandarin speakers in China and we easily get 1.33 billion people that speak Chinese as their native tongue.
GEERT ANTHONIS
Kaohsiung
In response to McGovern’s letters, I will cede that as in any society, there is indeed racism in Taiwan, but according to my experience it is relatively rare. Concluding the opposite after seeing Taiwanese staff writing waiguoren on your receipt for identification seems overly dramatic.
McGovern was apparently spat on, but never in my life did I get even close to this miserable treatment in Taiwan. Generally speaking, I am more embarrassed by the (positive) special treatment people give me.
In most cases, racism in Taiwan concerns “darker” Asians and blacks. I remember a ridiculous advertisement four years ago asking explicitly for a Caucasian English language teacher. McGovern’s claim that looking at the lawmakers’ ethnic background proves his point is also unfair. The Netherlands and the UK are often cited as some of the most liberal countries on earth, yet very few ethnic minorities have climbed up the social ladder far enough to get top positions in domestic politics there.
I would like to add that Taiwanese, South Koreans and Japanese are not just being forced to learn English, but display a genuine curiosity toward the Western world.
J.C. BRON
Luodong, Yilan County
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS