Long-term thinking
While the idea of combining the presidential and legislative elections (“KMT mulls idea of combined legislative, presidential election,” Jan. 18, page 3) is good in theory, the means of achieving it should respect democratic principles.
With the legislative election now less than a year away, it is not the time to start changing the rules. Furthermore, any changes in the dates of elections that involve extending term limits would seriously harm voters’ democratic rights.
A dangerous precedent was set with the extension of terms in the recently upgraded special municipalities and should not be repeated. Important decisions about elections should not be made for short-term political gains. Instead, they should aim to improve democracy in the long term.
I suggest that referendums could be held in conjunction with the upcoming legislative election with the question, “Do you agree that the legislative and presidential elections should be held simultaneously?”
If the referendum is passed, then the first combined election could be held in March 2016. This would necessitate extending the term of the next legislature by two or three months. However, this would be implicit in the referendum question and would therefore have the approval of voters.
DAVID REID
Taichung
The game continues
On each point of J.C. Bron’s attempt (Letters, Jan. 12, page 8) to argue against my claim that racism is rife in Taiwan (Letters, Jan. 9, page 8), Bron fails to understand the basis of its existence.
In making the point that “learning English is a national obsession,” Bron fails to understand that it is not a national obsession because people are so in love with Western culture, but merely because the draconian Taiwanese education system forces young Taiwanese to study English (well beyond the point of wanting to give up) in order to finish high school and get a “good” job.
Bron also states that everything is translated into English. Again, Bron fails to understand why. Chinese is a language which is read by very few [sic] so it is only natural to translate it into a Roman language. English is the most widely spoken language in the world, making it an obvious choice for translation.
Also, the English translation harks back to the military occupation [sic] of US forces in Taiwan in the years after World War II.
On another point, Bron states, “For an Anglo-Saxon, it is more difficult to find one’s way around in Germany or France than Taiwan.”
How on earth Bron comes to this conclusion is astounding! There are far more English speakers in Germany and France than in Taiwan. Go to Germany and you’ll find that everyone from the teenage shop assistant all the way up to the German finance minister can speak English.
Thinking about the translation of signs in Europe is also a pointless argument. First, almost all European languages use the Roman alphabet and so it can be read by most, eg, “Berlin” in German is Berlin.
Also, most European languages are very similar, so they don’t require much translation, eg, the German translation for “My shoe is brown” is “Mein Schuh ist braun.”
Bron then makes the point that “Taiwan is far less multi-ethnic than” Europe or the US.
Almost 400,000 foreigners live in Taiwan, many of whom are Chinese. People from China are talked about in Taiwan with much disgust, as are the many Filipino, Indonesian and Thai workers.
In addition to foreigners, Aborigines are viewed and abhorred in much the same way. The light-skinned, Taiwanese-born ethnic Chinese are considered the ultimate of high society. Just look at the lawmakers of Taiwan and you would find it difficult to find someone who doesn’t fit this description.
Taiwan is the 20th-most developed nation in the world. I find this attitude slightly disconcerting considering its wealth far surpasses that of most of Asia and Europe, yet features the social attitudes of former Soviet nations.
CALLUM MCGOVERN
Taipei
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS