It looks like the Grinch really has stolen Christmas — no, not today — but the many Christmases to come. The recently inked cross-strait medical and health cooperation pact will ensure this.
The accord provides for the exchange of information and cooperation in fighting infectious diseases, cracking down on counterfeit medicines and products, ensuring drug safety and establishing cooperation in clinical trials. The Department of Health said the pact would bring standards and norms for medical products on both sides of the Taiwan Strait into line with each other. For example, Chinese exporters of herbal medicines will have to produce certification on the safety of their products, safety checks must meet international standards and products will undergo three rounds of inspection. It sounds too good to be true, because it is.
To say that a pact dealing with public health was seen as easier to ink than one on investment protection, which had been scheduled to be signed this week as well, is mind-boggling would be an understatement. That more time was needed to ensure the safety of Taiwanese corporations and businesspeople, but not the health of the 23 million people of this nation, is truly sickening.
Of course, the investment pact has all those niggling details about business rights, treatment of investors, expropriation of property, compensation, dispute settlement and so on. Taiwanese businesspeople can get pretty heated about those — as can politicians, who have their own investments in China, or those of close relatives, to worry about.
It is so much easier to reach an accord on medical matters when you know the other side will just lie anyway. Why worry about frank disclosure with a government that has prevaricated, stonewalled and covered up one medical nightmare after another — the spread of AIDS through unhygienic blood collection and transfusions, SARS, harvesting of organs from executed prisoners, contamination of milk powder and other products, swine flu, etc, etc, etc.
Why not ask doctors Gao Yaojie (高耀潔) and Jiang Yanyong (蔣彥永) about what it’s like to “work with” Beijing in trying to fight the spread of infectious disease, or Zhao Lianhai (趙連海) about campaigning for product safety?
The 84-year-old Gao was persecuted and finally driven from China for raising attention about and treating villagers infected with HIV through contaminated blood transfusions and blood donation procedures. Jiang, the army surgeon who blew the lid off Beijing’s SARS cover-up in 2003, was first hailed as a hero and then reviled when he tried to draw attention to other issues. Zhao was sentenced last month to two-and-a-half years in jail for establishing a Web site, “Kidney Stone Babies,” for parents of children who became ill after consuming melamine-contaminated milk powder. He was found guilty of “inciting social disorder” after his initial arrest in December last year on a charge of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”
Yes, Taiwan’s government has just signed an agreement with a regime that has proven time and again that it is willing to sacrifice hundreds and thousands of its own people to ensure its continued rule. So while the freshly inked pact talks about raising medical and drug standards on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, it’s hard to see how Taiwan’s standards have anywhere to go but down.
Unlike Dr Seuss’ tale, there’s unlikely to be any change of heart in the Presidential Office or Zhongnanhai that would see the Grinches returning what they have stolen from the Whos as they slept. In real life, the Whos must wake up and prepare to fight to retain their rights and protections — through the ballot box, through protests and by refusing to accept a fait accompli.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath