According to recent overseas news reports, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has declared himself intent on continuing the process of de-Stalinization. He has said on several occasions that although Josef Stalin made contributions, the crimes he committed against his own people should not be forgiven. Medvedev’s opinion is clearly at variance with that of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who served 17 years in the KGB. Russian society’s divided historical memories of the former Soviet ruler can seem rather familiar to us in Taiwan.
Stalin’s Great Purge, which claimed several million victims, is regarded by historians as one of history’s darkest periods. Nevertheless, in many people’s minds Stalin was a national hero who defended the Soviet Union against invasion by Nazi Germany and who governed the country in a very effective way. This year, as Russia solemnly celebrates the 65th anniversary of victory in World War II, the question of Stalin’s contributions and failings has once again become a focus of discussion.
The Moscow city government reportedly planned to include Stalin’s name and photographs in exhibitions and street decorations connected with the anniversary. The Russian Communist Party and other left-wing groups warmly welcomed this idea, encouraging people to think of Stalin as a founding father, thinker and patriot.
Human rights groups, on the other hand, strongly opposed the idea, saying that displaying posters that included Stalin’s portrait would be disrespectful to the victims of his despotic regime. The organizers responded that their intention was not to make propaganda on Stalin’s behalf, but simply to display historical photographs. They said that the international community recognized the Soviet people as the victors, while Stalin was the nation’s leader at the time. They pointed out that some of the photos were of Stalin meeting with then US president Franklin Roosevelt and then British prime minister Winston Churchill at the Tehran and Yalta conferences, and that surely Stalin could not be deleted from such pictures.
The question of how to evaluate Stalin has long been a thorny issue in Russia. In a television poll conducted this year to choose historical heroes, Stalin got the third highest number of votes, and history books that seek to rationalize his oppression continue to be published.
Last year Medvedev warned the public not to exaggerate Stalin’s achievements. He urged people to always remember the millions of Soviet people who suffered and died under Stalin’s rule, and criticized efforts to absolve the despotic regime of its responsibility.
As Medvedev put it, “Even now we can hear voices saying that those numerous deaths were justified by some supreme goals of the state. I am convinced that no development of a country, no success or ambitions can be achieved through human grief and losses.”
Medvedev also expressed -concern that as many as 90 percent of young people could not name one famous people who suffered or died as a result of political repression.
Further steps planned by Medvedev may include fully declassifying the regime’s archives, increasing the compensation paid to victims, tracking down victim’s burial sites, building more museums and memorials, and possibly even enacting laws forbidding the whitewashing of dictators.
Taiwan, too, was subject to authoritarian rule during the Martial Law Era. Compared to Russia, Taiwan has done better in terms of declassifying documents and compensating victims, but when it comes to divided historical memories about Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the situation in Taiwan is strangely similar to that in Russia.
We in Taiwan are justifiably proud of our democratic achievements, but regrettably the governments of both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have displayed a reluctance to dispel antagonism between their supporters and made little effort to heal the wounds of the past.
On the one hand, the former DPP government was accused of clumsiness in its efforts at “de-Chiangization.” On the other, after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) led the KMT back to power, his government lost no time in putting back plaques and signs bearing the words “Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall,” which the DPP administration had for a while replaced with -“Democracy -Memorial Hall.” It has also continued to use state resources to commemorate the former authoritarian leaders.
Recently a dispute erupted over ownership of the diaries of the two Chiangs. Surprisingly, Commonwealth Publishing Co, which enjoys a good reputation, plans to publish the diaries of the elder Chiang under the title The Diaries of the Honorable Chiang (蔣公日記), choosing a feudal honorific, rather than The Diaries of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石日記), using his name in a neutral fashion, which is what Academia Sinica calls the diaries.
In addition, a descendant of the Chiangs has designed a range of memorabilia related to the two former dictators that includes pendants in the form of silver and gold-colored bullets. The idea behind this “creative” design may have something to do with the fact that much of Chiang Kai-shek’s life was devoted to military affairs, but for family members of people executed during the White Terror Era it is likely to have an altogether different meaning. Such an insensitive decision could easily reopen old wounds, but so far we have seen no public discussion of this matter, much less criticism.
In theory, Taiwan has traveled a lot further down the road of democratization than Russia, but when we compare the way the two societies have gone about handling the remnants of authoritarian rule, there is much less difference than one might imagine.
Yeh Hung-ling is executive secretary of the Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s