After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression.
In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning to Taiwan, I became quite busy with my duties at the start of the school term and was forced to set my annoyance aside.
The museum’s exhibit about Taiwanese indigenous groups undoubtedly reflects its stance on concealing reality, further illustrating that its curators are completely detached from the ideological trends of the international community.
The term “indigenous peoples” is used extensively throughout the world and is distinct from the term “ethnic minorities.” Therefore, the International Council for Traditions of Music and Dance, supported by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), has separate study groups for “Indigenous Music and Dance” and “Music and Minorities.”
In a report submitted to the UN in 1987, Jose R. Martinez Cobo proposed a definition for indigenous peoples that has since been revised and supplemented by scholars. Currently, indigenous peoples are defined internationally as those who live in and have a “strong link” to their ancestral lands, but became marginalized under colonization. They have “languages, cultures, beliefs, and knowledge systems” that are distinct from those of their colonizers.
From this, we can understand that having lived under the rule of colonizers is a prerequisite to being classified as indigenous. Taiwanese indigenous peoples have never lived under the rule of the People’s Republic of China — not even for a single day. They cannot even be considered Chinese indigenous people, let alone part of China’s ethnic minorities.
Although not all Chinese ethnic minorities were necessarily colonized by Han Chinese, the two groups have a long history of cultural exchange. In contrast, Taiwanese indigenous peoples have only had a maximum of 400 years of contact with Han Chinese.
Present-day Taiwanese indigenous peoples have been somewhat influenced by Han Chinese, but their Austronesian languages and culture are distinctly different. Therefore, from an academic perspective, it is groundless to define Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities.
The National Museum of Ethnology was established during the 1970 Japan World Exposition held in Osaka. At that time, research on indigenous peoples had not yet been popularized and the international community believed indigenous people would eventually disappear.
In the 21st century, not only have indigenous people not disappeared, but their presence has led to what anthropologist Marshall Sahlins calls “anthropological enlightenment.”
The National Museum of Ethnology was founded more than 50 years ago. Throughout the past half-century, the international perception of museums has undergone significant changes — museums are no longer places for the top-down education of the public.
The 2025 Expo is to be held in Osaka once again. On this occasion, I sincerely hope that the National Museum of Ethnology can keep up with the times. Reclassifying Taiwanese indigenous peoples is the first step on the road to change.
Chen Chun-bin is a professor at Taipei National University of the Arts.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS