Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week.
While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology researcher Wu Jieh-min (吳介民) at a forum last month said that it has been debated whether the global economy’s reliance on Taiwan’s chips would even be a deterrent to Chinese aggression.
Taiwan must proactively integrate further with the global community to strengthen its security and industrial resilience, he said.
As Wu suggested, Taiwan should not rely on the strength of its semiconductor industry alone to protect against a Chinese attack. Taiwan’s post-war economic boom was fueled by the manufacturing of textiles and electronic appliances, and although there was a shift to capital-intensive and knowledge-based industries in the 1980s, Taiwan’s dominance in chips did not occur until roughly two decades later.
Starting around 1977 there were major innovations in the industry from Taiwan’s Industrial Technology Research Institute, United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) and later Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), which was founded in 1987. However, the US remained dominant in the industry until about 2007, by which time TSMC was making the majority of the world’s more advanced semiconductors.
By the late 2010s, policymakers and analysts in the US and Europe were beginning to discuss Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry, and the threat that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would pose to the global economy. Likely in response to that threat, the US passed the CHIPS and Science Act in 2022 and the EU passed the European Chips Act last year, which aim to spur chip development and manufacturing.
Taiwan has enjoyed dominance in the industry for less than two decades, and with so much focus on chip development globally, it is anyone’s guess how long it can remain the top player. South Korea is also a major player, and China — despite being about three to five years behind Taiwan technologically speaking — is investing heavily in semiconductors.
It is unlikely that China would be motivated by Taiwan’s chip dominance to attempt an invasion to take over the fabs of TSMC, UMC and other Taiwanese companies. Companies have already told Bloomberg that they could remotely disable their fabs, rendering them useless. China would be unable to sell the chips to the global market following an invasion, anyway, as it would find itself under multiple sanctions.
Asia-Pacific Foundation of Canada research and strategy vice president Vina Nadjibulla said that China is trying to “fortify itself from the West” and “fully integrate itself” with the non-Western world. That might be true, but relationships with the US and EU would always be significantly more valuable to China than those with the BRICS bloc or Shanghai Cooperation Organization member countries.
While China is likely to be deterred from attacking Taiwan for fear of sanctions and potential US military involvement in the conflict, Taiwan should still invest heavily in its asymmetric warfare capabilities (submarines, long-range missiles and drones), and should seek to diversify its tech industry through dominance in artificial intelligence (AI) software and hardware.
President William Lai (賴清德) has already confirmed investments in AI, so Taiwan is on the right path, regardless of what happens to its chips sector.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big