What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established.
The KMT would likely not object to this notion.
However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking to claim KMT membership. They would cause the KMT to lose political legitimacy in Taiwan.
Should the Legislative Yuan pass a resolution stating that UN Resolution 2758 does not involve Taiwan?
The idea should not be feared like some type of monster merely because it was proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — doing so is to forget what it truly means to be “blue.”
So, what is UN Resolution 2758? Judging from the responses of the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — who have a combined majority in the Legislative Yuan — it seems they have not only forgotten their roots, but truly do not understand them.
The KMT dominated power in Taiwan for 59 years. Unless the ROC is already worthless to them, they ought to firmly remember their hatred for the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
In 1971, the year UN Resolution 2758 was passed, a majority of UN members voted to “restore the lawful rights of the PRC in the United Nations,” stating that the PRC was “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations,” and agreed to “expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek [蔣介石]” from the organization.
Chiang’s government referred to it as being expelled from a “criminal gang” and announced to its citizens that the ROC was withdrawing from the UN of its own accord.
If we do not wish to forget our past, we must acknowledge the harm posed by UN Resolution 2758. Since its passage, Taiwan has been excluded from participating in UN-affiliated organizations such as the World Health Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization.
As if taking the ROC’s seat was not enough, the PRC now distorts the resolution’s original meaning by saying it states that Taiwan belongs to China.
The PRC has stolen Taiwan’s space on the international stage and the public’s well-being — why are we not urgently considering paths to break this cycle and defend our country?
If we truly were to see UN Resolution 2758 for what it is, the KMT and the DPP would find consensus in hating a common enemy.
Its passage addressed the issue of China’s representation at the UN, but did nothing to handle the issue of the ROC and Taiwan. The UN merely expelled “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek” — it made no mention of the ROC or Taiwan.
It is now 2024. How much longer should the 23.5 million citizens of Taiwan continue to be suppressed and overlooked?
It is precisely because the answer to this question is so clear that the US and other international allies repeatedly help Taiwan refute China’s claims.
Last week, the Dutch Senate passed a motion stating that UN Resolution 2758 does not grant the PRC sovereign control over Taiwan, nor does it exclude Taiwan from participating in the UN or other international organizations.
It also required the Dutch government to promote this stance within the EU. How could supporters of the KMT and the TPP not welcome this friendly and just declaration?
Following the DPP’s push to respond by passing a resolution in the Legislative Yuan, it would be reasonable for the KMT to propose a more thorough discussion about the nation’s approach — the public would certainly understand.
However, KMT Secretary-General Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) suddenly and unexpectedly changed their tune, claiming that the resolution must be assessed as to whether it would impact the development of cross-strait peace and worsen tensions between Taiwan and China.
Later, during negotiations with opposing parties, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) declared the meeting adjourned and confiscated the proposal.
The KMT Central Committee said the main issue is that President William Lai (賴清德) must give up all elements of Taiwanese independence — including all previous mentions of independence within the DPP’s party platform — and focus on the constitutional government of the ROC.
The KMT has lost all direction. What does it even mean to be “blue” anymore? In their eyes, it is evidently to put the feelings of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) before the teachings of Chiang. Frankly, the ROC seems to have become worthless to them.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS