Kishore Mahbubani, a prominent Asian voice from Singapore and a man often highly critical of Europe, was recently asked what Asia could learn from Europe. His reply: Europe was above all the continent of peace, compassion and cooperation.
“Asia” may not exist culturally, historically, religiously, socially and economically the way that Europe does. It is a much more varied continent. However, “Asians” have been looking at, and reflecting upon, the European experiment for a long time. Enlightened Japanese elites are fascinated by Franco-German reconciliation. Could that model be applied to Japan’s relations with its former enemies, from Korea to China? And today, with the irresistible rise of a more assertive China, the European example of a continent where the prospect of war between traditional enemies — or contemporary rivals — has simply disappeared, is more attractive than ever.
One does not naturally associate China with the quest for compassion. Yet some Chinese have recently discovered the virtues of the Nordic social model and Chinese delegations have been coming to Oslo regularly to see what lessons they can bring home.
The reasoning of China’s elites is pragmatic: If Chinese were reassured by the existence of a social–welfare state, they would probably save less and spend more, allowing the domestic market to take over from export-led growth. Although the EU’s image has deteriorated, Asians still find Europe’s “sharing of sovereignty” model appealing in many ways.
For Mahbubani, the “lessons of Europe” are crystal clear. If emerging Asia begins to look more and more “like a socially and politically harmonious Europe,” the world would be a much better place.
At a time when Europeans are full of self-doubt, though perhaps not as morose as the French, this praise from thoughtful Asians is more than welcome. Europeans, unfortunately, too often fail to see the merits of their peaceful conquest over their own worst natures.
Moreover, Europeans should, in the same spirit of openness, ask themselves what they can learn from Asia. In a multipolar world, the flow of examples and inspiration has become a two-way street. Europeans can no longer look down upon Asians with a “Western” combination of arrogance and ignorance, perceiving themselves as the unique carriers of a universal message.
The problem, of course, is that the concept of Asia is largely a Western one. Asians do not perceive themselves as Asians in the way that most Europeans view themselves as Europeans. India’s historical patrimony is very different from China’s, for example, not to mention the singular experience of Japan.
Yet it is legitimate to ask what, for Europeans looking at Asia, would be the equivalent of the “peace, compassion and cooperation” that Asians see in Europe? Could it be a combination of hope, energy, long-term thinking and curiosity?
Hope is a state of mind and not only the result of economic growth. Hope means confidence and young Asians are exuding the stuff, whereas young Europeans — arrogant toward others and diffident toward themselves — too often lack “appetite” and cling to the status quo, seeming to demand protection from life. Many Chinese may dream of spending like Europeans, but the nightmare of most Europeans nowadays is that they might have to start working as hard as the Chinese.
Beyond confidence and the energy that goes with an appetite for success, Europeans lack long-term thinking and curiosity about the “other” in general. As a result, they know little about the history, culture and languages of Asia. By contrast, the large numbers of young Chinese and Indians who are graduating from the best Western universities (mostly in the US) know the Western mind from the inside, and thus feel that they understand “what makes [Westerners] tick.”
Indeed, they are “Westerners,” while remaining themselves. How many Europeans can claim such familiarity with the “Asian Other?” The fact that so many Asian students come to the West to study — and so few Europeans (Westerners) do so in Asia — is not a sign of the superiority of the Western mind and model. On the contrary, it impoverishes the Western mindset, if not the Western culture.
The need to for Westerners to open themselves to the Asian mind, and even to some different societal models, does not imply, however, that Westerners should relinquish their values. The peace, compassion and cooperation Asians are contemplating with such admiration are the direct product of values which some of them see as “Western,” and that, yes, Westerners regard as “universal.”
Given Asia’s rise, it is, of course, illusory for Europeans to consider their relations with the biggest Asian power, China, only through the prism of human rights. Moreover, Europe’s ability to exert pressure on China is extremely limited at best and may be least potent where Chinese domestic matters are concerned.
Nevertheless, Europeans should not be deterred by the Chinese government’s anger at the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to the Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波). In the name of Europe’s core values, all EU ambassadors to Norway should make a point of attending the Nobel award ceremony — which the imprisoned Liu cannot — despite China’s call for them to stay away. It is simply a question of self-respect — and, ultimately, that of China.
Dominique Moisi is the author of The Geopolitics of Emotion.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
China took advantage of the vacuum left behind when US carriers stayed out of the western Pacific Ocean due to COVID-19 outbreaks on several US Navy warships. The Chinese government is solidifying its hold on artificial islands in the South China Sea by moving in missiles and surveillance equipment, and formalizing its occupation by creating two municipal districts in the region under Hainan Island’s Sansha — Xisha District on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) to administer the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Nansha District on Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef, 永暑島) to administer the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday wrapped up its annual party conference-cum-national decision-making forums in Beijing: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), known colloquially as the “two meetings.” They are normally tightly choreographed affairs, designed to project an image of stability and unassailable strength, but several events leading up this month’s sessions provided strong indications that all is not well in the state of Denmark. The first sign of major discontent came in March, at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in China, when an article by real-estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a