Preserving remote places
Chan Shun-kuei (詹順貴) recently discussed the merits of upgrading the Suhua Highway (“Placing facts back in Suhua debate,” Nov. 19, page 8). One consideration I would like to add is whether easy access to every place is really a desirable goal. Disregarding the obvious costs to taxpayer and environment for the moment, building a faster and safer road at first always sounds like a good idea. However, the difficulty of reaching a remote place may enhance the charm of the travel experience.
To use an extreme example: I think most people would agree that being put on top of Mount Everest by a helicopter, although quicker and safer, would not really match the experience of climbing up its flanks for days, risking life and limb. We should value the fact that some places on earth remain remote, and that the effort of getting there is part of the quality of the travel experience.
I have heard it said there is no place in Taiwan that is so beautiful that a little bit of concrete would not increase its beauty. We should perhaps pause for a moment and consider whether the old Suhua Highway, because of the way it is built and the scenery it offers, is not worth preserving, and that the money would be better spent on enforcing traffic regulations and safe driving. From Chan Shun-kuei’s article, it is apparent that the old Suhua Highway is not really inherently dangerous, but that it is reckless driving that endangers people. Several thousand people die on Taiwan’s roads each year, making it a leading cause of death.
I always wonder what kind of money would be thrown at a terrorist group that would annually kill several thousand people, but when it comes to protecting us against the terrorists of the street, the government of Taiwan appears to be especially complacent. Numerous recent letters in the Taipei Times have pointed out that, for a country that has so much going for it, the appalling driving habits and the almost nonexistent enforcement of traffic rules are a real blight on this country.
I would strongly recommend that, in order to protect some of the remaining beautiful, natural and quiet places of Taiwan, the government of Taiwan should spend its money on making its existing streets safer instead of relentlessly building more and more roads into even the remotest corners of the country, or upgrading its existing ones. Thus, the present Suhua Highway would not just become a safer road to travel on, but also a relaxing travel experience through one of the more remote and scenic areas of Taiwan. The charm is in getting there — slowly and safely.
BRUNO WALTHER
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath