The disqualification of Taiwanese taekwondo contestant Yang Shu-chun (楊淑君) at the Asian Games in Guangzhou, China, has provoked an uproar from all quarters. As Asia Games officials and the Taiwanese side each insist on their own version of the story and cross-strait conspiracy theories run rampant, it is very difficult to work out what actually happened and where the blame lies.
While angry people in Taiwan are unanimously taking aim at external factors, I have to ask what, if anything, the Sports Affairs Council and the Taiwanese delegation to the Asia Games did to prepare for such a foreseeable event as Yang’s unfair disqualification.
This is by no means the first time that South Korean referees have made controversial judgments at sporting events. This is especially true of taekwondo, a sport in which South Korea holds a dominant position. The controversy over the knockout of Taiwanese contestant Tseng Ching-hsiang (曾敬翔) at the East Asian Games in Hong Kong last December is just one example.
Another factor we should have been aware of is China’s consistent effort to suppress our country’s athletes at sporting events. There have been plenty of examples, never mind the fact that this time China was the host country.
Given that these unfavorable factors were already well known, and that an unfortunate incident at the Asian Games was therefore quite predictable, I feel it was essential to take thorough precautions before the games got underway. So what did the sports council and our Asian Games delegation actually do in this regard?
I am curious to know why there was no controversy about the protective gear worn by Taiwanese gold medal winner Huang Hsien-yung (黃顯詠), while Yang’s gear got her into this ridiculous situation. Clearly these two contestants were wearing different kinds of foot gear. However, why would two athletes from the same delegation be wearing different kinds of protective gear?
The team coaches said after the incident that Yang was equipped in accordance with the rulebook and that her foot guards had been approved when officials inspected them before the match. Of course, Asian Games officials deny this and the officials who inspected Yang’s equipment are nowhere to be found.
However, we still have to ask what the sports council did to help the coaches and competitors with matters such as translation, assistance in changing protective gear and ensuring that there would be no hitches when the equipment was inspected.
It was pretty clear that Yang was going to come up against the host country’s top competitor, Wu Jingyu (吳靜鈺), who is considered Yang’s archrival, in the finals. Surely the sports council should have foreseen that there might be some kind of political interference and taken the utmost care to help the coach and competitor deal with anything that might come up. Given their failure to do so, one can only conclude that the sports council and delegation officials are extremely naive.
Lin Hsuan-chu is an assistant professor at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath