As one of the co-signers of several letters by a group of about 30 international academics and writers to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) about the erosion of justice in Taiwan since he took office in May 2008, I was pleased to hear about the Taipei District Court’s verdict on Friday acquitting former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his wife of money-laundering charges. Finally, I thought, Taiwan’s judicial system is moving in the direction of fairness and impartiality.
However, we were in for a rude awakening when over the weekend the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — from Ma on down — displayed partisanship at its worst when party members lambasted the court’s ruling and urged voters to “vent their displeasure” at the upcoming elections for five special municipalities on Nov. 27.
At a KMT election event in Tainan on Sunday morning, Ma is reported to have stated that while the judiciary must be independent, it must not isolate itself from the outside world or deviate from public expectations.
“The judiciary must protect the interests of the good and the honest. That is the least the system can do,” Ma said.
Ma’s implication was of course that the district court was not living up to public expectations and that it was not protecting “the good and the honest.”
It is indeed interesting to see Ma’s sudden change of heart about the court system: For the past two years, the courts perpetrated one atrocious gaffe after another — both in the case of Chen and others — and appeals for judiciary reform were met with either stony silence or a blase statement that “we will not interfere in the judiciary.” Now Ma and KMT officials are falling over each other to condemn a ruling they don’t like.
Illustrative of the venom with which the KMT is approaching the matter is the fact that KMT caucus secretary-general Lin Tsang-min (林滄敏) and the party’s Greater Kaohsiung mayoral candidate, KMT Legislator Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順), trotted off to the Control Yuan to ask it to censure the lead judge, Chou Chan-chun (周占春), for “neglect of duties” in the case. In fact, the judge should be highly commended for letting legal arguments prevail over political considerations.
It is also intriguing to note that KMT Secretary--General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) announced that “pushing for judicial reform and fighting corruption” had been added as themes for an upcoming “Walk for Taipei” scheduled for Nov. 21 in support of KMT Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌). The irony is that Hau has been in hot water when it was discovered that a contractor associated with the KMT was paid up to 10 times the market price for work for the Taipei International Flora Expo.
Why do we get the feeling that King’s newfound enthusiasm for judicial reform and his stance against corruption will focus exclusively on the case against the former president and will not touch on the shenanigans of Hau and his city officials?
While this may be expected of party hacks like King and Hau who are trying to play politics with the situation, one would have expected Ma to take a higher road. Isn’t he, as president of the country, expected to rise above local politics?
Yes, Taiwan is in serious need of judicial reform, but appeals in that direction during the past two years — including from Jerome Cohen, Ma’s erstwhile adviser at Harvard — have fallen on deaf ears in the Presidential Office. If Ma is really serious about judicial reform and about fairness and impartiality in the system, he would invite his old mentor to Taiwan and initiate a truly bipartisan effort in that direction.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of the Washington-based Taiwan Communique.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS