Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was thrown behind bars for demanding the rights that he is entitled to by the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China. When Liu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the whole world supported the decision, while the Chinese government said it was an insult to the Chinese people and tried to block the news. At the same time, senior members of China’s intelligentsia released an open letter in which they demanded freedom of the press, but this too was blocked by the Chinese government.
These two issues directly point to the national shame of China, a supposed great power. China does not allow its people basic freedoms, such as freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
The book White House Diary contains a conversation between former US president Jimmy Carter and former Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiao-ping (鄧小平). Carter said US law stipulates that freedom of emigration was a condition required for a country to be granted most favored nation status. In response, Deng asked if allowing 10 million Chinese to emigrate to the US would be enough, to which Carter quickly responded that the US would then send 10,000 reporters to China. The two then laughed and dropped the matter. That happened 30 years ago, when China’s “democratic dictatorship” was of the same ilk as the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) martial law rule in Taiwan. Both parties spied on their own people and kept tight controls on press freedom.
Unfortunately, as conscientious people of the old guard in China are calling for press freedom, Taiwan’s hard-earned freedoms of the press and free speech are being restricted and abused by an anti-democratic regime and certain media outlets. Carter’s remarks highlight how the media can “create trouble” in democratic societies and how freedom, independence, criticism and monitoring protect the government and society from corruption. The media are not supposed to exist to sing the praises of the powerful and cover up their mistakes. However, honest advice is hard to take and authoritarian rule always relies on coercion and bribery to control the media.
The lifting of martial law and Taiwan’s democratization removed controls on the freedoms of expression and the press. During the Martial Law era, Taiwan’s media did as they were told, and then they strongly criticized the first pro-Taiwanese government. After the election of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), either because of bias or favoritism, Taiwan’s media has become corrupt, stopped differentiating between right and wrong and given up monitoring the government, thus abandoning the most important function media serves in a democratic society.
It is only natural that an anti-democratic person longing to be a dictator like Ma would admire China’s media censorship, but it is completely unexpected that Taiwan’s media outlets, after developing under martial law, would respond to press freedom by degrading themselves and becoming the running dogs of the government. If Carter had sent this kind of reporter, I am sure Deng would have been only too happy to take him up on his offer.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing