Recently the government has let it be known, on several occasions, that it has not yet ruled out levying a tax on luxury apartments or goods, or a capital gains tax. The idea behind this would be to increase the tax burden on the wealthy in an effort to reduce the rich-poor divide in the country, which has been growing steadily over the past few years. Given the tax reforms the government has been introducing since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power in 2008, one doesn’t hold out that much hope.
When Ma had just taken office, he called together representatives from industry, the civil service, academia and civic groups to get involved in the Tax Reform Commission. The commission announced, with much fanfare, that the government would take a four-pronged approach to practical tax reform. It would stimulate economic growth, create a sustainable environment for such growth, improve social equality and increase Taiwan’s international competitiveness.
Just a few months later, several of the academics involved in the commission proposed a temporary suspension of operations, saying they felt their expert opinions were not being taken seriously. They were not happy with being part of a rubber-stamp endorsement for the government’s policy of reducing taxes.
One of them, Chen Ting-an (陳聽安) of the Taiwan Economic Association, excoriated the government for wanting to reduce the inheritance tax to 10 percent, with nothing in place to implement it. It was polishing the cart before the horse was even born. Soon after, the civic group Alliance for Fair Tax Reform pulled out of the commission, saying that the reforms being considered were Robin Hood in reverse. Giving more tax breaks to the rich would make the tax system even more unfair: Reform would only widen the wealth gap and increase government debt.
By this point, the commission was a reform commission in name only. Any tax reforms it came out with were likely to be limited in nature and destined to hemorrhage national tax revenue.
According to last year’s National Audit Office report on the central government’s final accounts, the Ma administration had already implemented 14 tax cuts, including on the commodity, inheritance and income taxes. By the time the amount of tax revenue not yet declared or accounted for has been deducted, the government has seen at least NT$80 billion (US$2.6 billion) for the period from 2008 to this year escape.
The government also loses a considerable amount of tax revenue through undercharged tax, which last year was in excess of NT$200 billion. After annual revenue and expenditure have been accounted for, this leaves us with a shortfall of NT$161 billion. Unpaid public finance debt over a year old now stands at more than NT$4 trillion, up from NT$2.6 trillion at the end of 2001.
Further tax reductions means less revenue, and when there are insufficient incoming funds, the only option is to borrow more and extend the existing debt. The problem with this, of course, is that the only way the government is going to be able to repay this money is through raising taxes. Unfortunately, the government’s main source of tax revenue is from the salaried, making up around 70 percent of the pie. If the government excludes capital gains on stock trading and land transactions by the more wealthy people at the top of the pyramid, the tax system will be unfair.
As one of the top commission consultants, Cyrus Chu (朱敬一) of Academia Sinica has said: “The past couple of years have been a dark time in the history of taxation [in Taiwan] and unless the matter is thoroughly investigated, it is going to be very difficult to achieve any new tax reform in this country.”
Leou Chia-feng is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS