The government as God
How ironic that Chinese officials should label the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) a “blasphemy.”
Officially, China is an atheist state, although a certain amount of religious worship is tolerated in -government--controlled “patriotic churches.”
These patriotic churches must register with the government and allow all decisions — including those regarding the nomination of clergy such as bishops — to be made under the control of the central government.
However, since the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) takeover in 1949, China has officially been an atheist state, and rather hostile toward all religion in general. The idea of the Chinese government granting special visas to missionaries, as is the case in the Republic of Taiwan, is unthinkable.
The CCP government is highly suspicious and hostile toward all religions, irrespective of their provenance. It views traditional Chinese religion as backward and a hindrance to the development of socialist mores. It also views Western religions, such as Christianity, as tools of “oppressive colonialism” and remnants of foreign domination.
Now that its Western regions with large Muslim populations — the Uighurs, for example — have become “restive” and volatile, China has applied its bellicose and paranoid policies to these areas.
The same is true of Tibet. Moreover, in these areas, Chinese are using an ancient tactic — one that dates back to ancient Assyria. The Chinese are flooding these regions with a huge influx of Han Chinese with the aim of totally assimilating — and thus obliterating — the smaller, local ethnic groups. They will continue to do this until no trace is left of Tibetan or Uighur culture.
It is a form of genocide without the usual accompanying mass murder.
Given that China is officially atheist, it is quite ironic that the government’s propagandists should employ the term “blasphemy.”
This is a sure indication of how flustered, shocked and upset they must be after hearing the peace prize news.
The term “blasphemy” denotes a contemptuous, profane, disrespectful act, utterance, or writing that concerns God or a religious entity.
Blasphemy is an impious act or utterance concerning God or some sacred entity.
So why would the Chinese government’s propagandists employ the term “blasphemy” at all, when officially it insists that there is no God?
After all, how can there be blasphemy when there is no God?
They do so for the same reason that China continually spews its bilge that it has the “sacred” duty to “reunify” the “renegade province” of Taiwan with the “motherland.” In an officially atheist country such as China, the government seeks to usurp the place of God.
The government seeks to set itself up as God. This form of “auto-deification” is a form of idolatry, a form of idolatry that is as ruinous as it is absurd.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing