Repeat after me: “Children are our most precious treasures.” Did it feel good? Repeat another three times, and I’m sure you’ll feel an impulse to have a baby. This is, after all, the slogan that won the NT$1 million (US$31,231) award in the Ministry of the Interior’s competition for a slogan to encourage population growth, so how could it not have that effect?
An aging population and decreasing birth rates are general trends in developed societies, and Taiwan is no exception. Given that Taiwan’s birth rate is now the world’s lowest, how serious is the problem? According to the Ministry of Education, the number of new first-grade students will drop by 15,000 this year, eliminating 500 classes around the nation. This number is expected to increase by another 2,000 students annually.
To solve this situation, the Ministry of the Interior, the ministry responsible for population policies, organized an online competition with a NT$1 million award for the person who came up with the best slogan to promote child birth. Despite strong criticism, the ministry could not be stopped. Now the slogan is upon us, so reciting it aloud or quietly repeating it to yourself will surely make you want to have a baby. However, even if our young men and women really were excited by the slogan, the hard facts of reality would pour cold water on their desire. The fact is that even the woman who wrote the slogan says that after having thought the issue over a hundred times, she would not dare have a child.
Today, double-income families are the norm. What will happen with work and family income during the pregnancy? Who will look after the child? Businesses ignore the maternity leave promised by the government. The cost of education, living expenses, upbringing and medical care is huge, the childcare system is insufficient and the cost of babysitters is high, so family expenses will increase. The economy is slow, unemployment high, salaries are falling, housing prices are going up, the divorce rate is soaring, the environment is deteriorating, social order is worsening and people are pessimistic about Taiwan’s future — too many concrete practical problems must be resolved, and another slogan won’t do it.
The different ministries and government agencies have already pushed out a host of policies to encourage child birth, such as child birth subsidies, childcare subsidies, maternity leave, family subsidies for young families and so on. Despite these policies, Taiwan’s birth rate has dropped to become the world’s lowest. The reason is that many of these policies are not enforced, that they lack support in business circles and that society is not ready to fully accept them. Take maternity leave, for example: Although legislation has been promulgated, businesses do not comply and pregnant women worry that they will lose their jobs, and so do not apply for maternity leave. The result is that the policy has become merely decorative, a policy to make the government look good. If even legislation is ignored, what use is another slogan?
The ministry’s attempt to use a slogan to improve the low birth rate is a perfect illustration of how President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government are implementing a new style of government: Rule by slogan. They are trying to avoid having to solve real problems by diverting the public’s attention with catchy slogans and soaring rhetoric. The government should instead find the source of the problem and the reason why people are so worried about having children, then take action to remove these obstacles. That would be much more effective than coming up with yet another slogan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing