The most valuable thing Taiwan will get from the recently passed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement will be the ability to move more freely on the international stage and to strike free-trade agreements.
To echo the view of the Economist, Taiwan will not unify with China simply to take advantage of a few tariff breaks, nor will there be a permanent peace across the Taiwan Strait, especially as China has failed to reduce the number of missiles it aims at Taiwan.
Achieving trade agreements with Southeast Asian nations and beyond is crucial to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election campaign. Therefore, if China pressures them not to sign, Ma’s electoral hopes will be dealt a serious blow. However, such an outcome is not in Beijing’s interest. China is comfortable with Ma and feels that it can trust him. Its worst nightmare is the return to power of the Democratic Progressive Party.
Between now and the 2012 presidential election, Taiwan has a window of opportunity to promote itself on the international stage and to better economically connect with other countries. This will strengthen Taiwan’s own identity and sovereignty.
However, in order to make the most of this, Taiwan must seriously improve the promotion of its international image.
Expensive government advertisements placed in upscale US magazines have a limited effect when it comes to creating a clear image of Taiwan. Unfortunately, mentioning Taiwan to many in the US elicits the response that the shopping in Bangkok (Thailand) is fantastic.
The challenge is here and now. The Taiwan lobby in the US Congress was weakened under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). Now that China is successfully copying many of the lobby’s techniques, the growth in influence of the pro-China business lobby only adds to the urgency of the matter.
While China aggressively expands the number of its Confucius Institutes, of which there are already 316 operating in 94 countries, serving as instruments of soft power through promoting the study of Chinese language and culture, I have yet to see or hear of any of the promised “Taiwan Academies” being established.
As China prepares to shape world opinion with its expanded information campaign, Taiwan ought to follow the example of Japan or Germany. Japan’s NHK World is an English-language TV program that is broadcast in the US and focuses on Japanese affairs. Germany enhances its global image through the Deutsche Welle, which broadcasts TV shows, in several languages, about all aspects of contemporary Germany. Other examples can be found in the UK’s BBC World and France 24. Clearly, China sees the benefit of such TV programs as it will soon start its own English-language TV programming with global reach.
During a recent visit to the East-West Center in Hawaii, eminent US-China scholar Jerome Cohen said it all: “It [Taiwan] is certainly free and certainly impressive. Taiwan is a great product for soft power. It has something to sell,” but hasn’t made enough effort to get its story out there.
It is the story of an agrarian-based former colony that bore the brunt of authoritarianism under the boot of martial law, transformed itself into a key link in the global supply chain of computer parts and established a vibrant participatory democracy based on the rule of law. Many nations would like to enjoy the standard of living and freedom that Taiwan has achieved.
Unfortunately, Taiwan’s priorities are confused. After a dismal showing at the 2008 Olympics, Taiwan is reported to be investing significant sums to do better in 2012. In contrast, it seems far less sure of what to do when it comes to improving international communications.
Bill Sharp is a faculty member of Hawaii Pacific University in Honolulu.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS