The chief executive of Lloyds is the last man standing among the banks that bore the brunt of the financial crisis.
Three years ago, Eric Daniels was busy cementing Lloyds’ reputation as something of a boring bank, reporting its first dividend increase in five years on the back of a steady rise in profits.
However, his business was plunged into the maelstrom when the deal to rescue HBOS — famously sealed at a cocktail party — left Lloyds bloated with toxic debt. Lloyds’s chairman, Sir Victor Blank, paid for that deal with his job as the bank took recourse to the taxpayer for funds.
Though Daniels, who was deeply involved in the HBOS rescue as well, has managed to hang on, determined to prove that the takeover would ultimately turn out to be a sound move. Last week, revealing half-year profits of £1.6 billion (US$2.5 billion) and a halving of bad debts, he was looking more secure.
Unlike Andy Hornby, a retailer who was hired by HBOS for his marketing skills, Daniels is a lifelong banker who had 25 years at Citibank under his belt before joining Lloyds in 2001. He is said to understand the ”plumbing” of the industry like few others and is well-regarded among fellow bankers.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers