Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) accompanied the victims of pollution caused by recent fires at Formosa Petrochemical Corp’s Sixth Naphtha Cracker in Mailiao Township (麥寮) when they staged a protest in the capital a few days ago.
The demonstrators got down on their knees outside the Executive Yuan, with the fierce sun beating down, and waited for some kind of official response. Unfortunately for them, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), the one man who has the power to do something about their complaint and who has said on numerous occasions he stands on the side of the common people, did not even deign to show his face.
Then there was Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), currently campaigning for the position of mayor of Greater Taichung, just back from a trip to Southeast Asia. The very night he returned, Hu rushed over to the City God temple where, according to official records, he wished the resident deity a happy birthday. While he was there, he also prayed for help in solving the killing of alleged gangster Weng Chi-nan (翁奇楠).
The protest succeeded in highlighting the callous arrogance of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, which enjoys government power but seemingly does not understand that its role is to look out for the public. Democracy is not about begging, however; it is about having the legitimate right to demand responsible government and accountability. Groveling is a legacy of China’s feudal, imperial past, and has no place in the age of modern democracy.
The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has devastated the livelihoods of local fishermen and women. The victims of the spill came out fighting, demanding compensation and sued. BP accepted it was at fault, setting aside US$38 billion for compensation claims and saw to it that negligent executives were replaced. The US government then ordered an oil well safety review and suspended any new offshore drilling projects. This is what is meant by democracy and responsibility.
Corporate arrogance and irresponsibility are only possible when arrogance and irresponsibility in government are widespread and tolerated.
Hu has the police and state-of-the-art surveillance equipment at his disposal, but still hasn’t been able to get to the bottom of the homicide. At a loss, he goes to beg for help from a wooden idol, asking it to intervene on his behalf. It was, to be honest, a bit of a spectacle and a resounding fall from grace for Hu.
Seeking help from the gods in public affairs is ridiculous. Granted, in the US politicians make frequent references to God in their rhetoric, but when did you last hear the mayor of New York calling on God to come and have a look at the city accounts, sort out the budget deficit or crack any unsolved homicides for him?
If the city god really can intervene, why not have it get rid of corruption, or even arrange for peace on Earth? If running a city required the help of a wooden idol or mystical deities, we wouldn’t need a mayor, we would need a high priest instead; at least he would hold the incense properly and know what incantations to use to communicate with the other side.
Hu studied at Oxford University. Once he aspired to the heights of academic achievementp; now he is reduced to appealing for help from the city god. How do we respond to that?
We need to set democracy and politics in Taiwan back on the right track. Enough of the groveling and praying. Please.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS