In 1996, China threatened Taiwan by launching weeklong missile tests off its coastline, designed to intimidate Taiwanese and influence the presidential election. Even though China warned the US that any intervention to defend Taiwan could lead to war and possibly even a nuclear exchange, Washington unflinchingly dispatched two aircraft carrier battle groups to protect Taiwan, demonstrating its commitment to the region. It is worth noting that one of the carriers, the USS Nimitz, sailed through the Taiwan Strait.
However, 14 years after the Taiwan Strait Crisis, the security situation in Northeast Asia is markedly different.
The US and South Korea recently held a joint naval exercise, mobilizing 8,000 troops, 20 ships and submarines — including the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George Washington and 200 planes — in the Yellow Sea and the Sea of Japan in response to the torpedoing of a South Korean naval ship, believed by the US and South Korea to be the work of Pyongyang.
Although the US has said that the maneuvers were aimed at sending a strong message to Pyongyang that aggression will not be tolerated, China, North Korea’s adamant supporter, has strongly protested the drills, saying its national interest will be damaged if a US aircraft carrier is deployed in the Yellow Sea, which it views as its “backyard.”
Instead of ignoring these objections, the US made an unprecedented strategic U-turn, deciding to relocate some of the drills away from the sensitive Yellow Sea to the Sea of Japan. Moreover, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington will not now enter the Yellow Sea. This conciliatory gesture not only shocked many security experts in South Korea and Japan, but also carries implications for Taiwan.
Clearly, China’s increasingly assertive posture toward the Western Pacific has significantly shifted the military status quo that has been maintained in Northeast Asia since World War II. Ten Chinese naval ships violated Japan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around Okinawa in April, another two warships passed close to Okinawa on their way to the Pacific early this month and Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) criticized US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s remarks at the ASEAN Regional Forum about resolving disputes in the South China Sea multilaterally as an “attack” on China. Beijing’s strong words and “saber-rattling” perfectly reflect its mindset.
Even though under international law it is legitimate for the US and South Korea to conduct military drills in international waters, Beijing believes this could threaten its sovereignty and therefore considers it unacceptable. Accordingly, China is now a pivotal consideration for the US when planning maneuvers in the area. Moreover, by backing off the US might well embolden China to take further action that radically alters the balance of power in Northeast Asia.
The US has repeatedly expressed its concerns over China’s rapid military modernization and lack of transparency, as Beijing’s relentless development of anti-satellite capabilities, quieter submarines, sophisticated mines and particularly the latest anti-ship ballistic missiles — known as “carrier killers” — constitute a credible and physical threat to its neighbors. As China’s economy continues to grow over the coming decade, its military capabilities will become ever more of a concern.
RSS