Former Judicial Yuan president Lai In-jaw (賴英照) is widely considered to be knowledgeable and honest. Many were surprised when he tendered his resignation in the wake of allegations of corruption among Taiwan High Court judges, a decision that met with much public displeasure.
Reflecting this surprise, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said: “If the Judicial Yuan president had to resign to take responsibility for [alleged] corruption among his subordinates, then why didn’t National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞) have to resign for police corruption [in Taichung City]?”
It’s a little bit like the ancient Chinese law that punished the family and friends of an offender, according to which both Premier Wu Dun-yih (吳敦義) and Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), as Wang’s immediate supervisors, should also be held responsible.
Lo also said: “Discipline within Taiwan’s military has long been chaotic, but no national defense minister has resigned to take responsibility. As for the alleged corruption, why didn’t the Control Yuan, which is charged with monitoring the government, see the problem earlier? Doesn’t that mean Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) should resign? Surely the same standard should apply to all officials, regardless of political affiliation.”
However, Lo appears to have conveniently overlooked other recent scandals, such as why Minister of Transportation and Communications, Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國), wasn’t punished for the recent scandals at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport.
Another issue is Miaoli County Government’s controversial expropriation of farmland in Dapu Borough (大埔), Jhunan Township (竹南), where Jiang, Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) and other officials have said only that they will act in accordance with the law. In contrast, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Wu seem to only be concerned by the political ramifications, demanding the KMT County Commissioner, Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻), listen more to the protesters.
In theory, the culture of the judicial system differs from that of other governmental heirarchies because the Judicial Yuan president has no authority to investigate the wrongdoings of judges. Meanwhile, judges issue their verdicts independently and without interference and most demonstrate mutual respect by not meddling in each others cases.
This has been the practice for years. Whenever alleged corruption or misconduct occurs within the judiciary, the Ministry of Justice or a special investigation team under the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office handles the case.
In recent years, scandals involving prosecutors have been frequent. Take the recent case for example. Prosecutor Chiu Mao-jung (邱茂榮), along with three judges, have been detained on suspicion of corruption. However, Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) has not taken any responsibility. Ma and Wu simply expressed their deep disappointment and reaffirmed their determination to punish those involved, announcing the establishment of an anti-corruption agency under the Ministry of Justice. Ma has also pledged to build a clean and capable government, yet today his administration is neither.
Over the last two years there has been a palpable sense that the Ma administration is coming apart at the seams and its pursuit of justice has failed in the face of a seemingly endless list of corruption cases. Ma and other key officials have not, however, taken responsibility or apologized for this. Instead, they have passed the buck telling others to step down and making every effort to redirect attention. Former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) corruption scandals, for example, have been continually used as something to hide behind.
Raela Tosh, daughter of World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer, who visited Taiwan earlier this month, said that, “In an authoritarian country, you need to convince the government, but in a free country, it’s more important to convince the people.”
What I would like to know is how Ma intends to convince the people of Taiwan.
Lu I-ming is former publisher and president of Taiwan’s Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
The Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation has demanded an apology from China Central Television (CCTV), accusing the Chinese state broadcaster of using “deceptive editing” and distorting the intent of a recent documentary on “comfort women.” According to the foundation, the Ama Museum in Taipei granted CCTV limited permission to film on the condition that the footage be used solely for public education. Yet when the documentary aired, the museum was reportedly presented alongside commentary condemning Taiwan’s alleged “warmongering” and criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s stance toward Japan. Instead of focusing on women’s rights or historical memory, the program appeared crafted
RSS