Hon Hai Group chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) is no doubt one of the most successful businessmen in the world.
It would, however, be an overstatement to say that Gou built his entire fortune by exploiting cheap Chinese labor, as some academics have accused him of doing. In a bout of name-calling, these academics have called him “the disgrace of Taiwan” after a string of suicides at his Shenzhen factory.
It is in the nature of business to seek to maximize profits by minimizing overheads, including the cost of labor and land, and some internationally recognized Taiwanese businesses have relocated their assembly lines from China to Indonesia to take advantage of the even cheaper labor there, where wages are so low that factory owners are too embarrassed to disclose them.
However, this isn’t to say that Gou and his Hon Hai Group, although a big contributor to the local economy, are entitled to any preferential treatment in Taiwan.
In the case of the Dapu (大埔) farmland controversy, the Miaoli County Government has obviously sided with Innolux Display Corp — which Hon Hai has invested in — and seized five hectares of farmland in Jhunan Township (竹南) without the consent of the 24 families who own the land.
The county government’s move is aimed at speeding up the planned expansion of the Hsinchu Science Park, where Innolux Display originally planned to build its high-end, newer-generation fabs with an initial investment of NT$120 billion (US$3.73 billion).
The investment and expansion plan sound like good news for both the county’s and the nation’s economic development and employment.
However, it now seems that the county government’s drive to expropriate that land may have been in vain, as Hon Hai threatened on Wednesday to re-evaluate its investment in Taiwan.
All the blame should be on the Miaoli County Government, since Taiwan, unlike China, remains a country where the property rights of its nationals are enshrined in, and protected by, the Constitution.
Accordingly, the Control Yuan should involve itself in the controversy and launch investigations into alleged negligence by county government officials and its Commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻), who appears to have tried to skirt his responsibilities with excuses, including a plea that he “really didn’t know there were rice paddies there.”
That is an absurd excuse for a county magistrate, a person who is supposed to know the county he is in charge of better than anyone else.
As for Hon Hai, any threat to leave Taiwan because of the land controversy will not make its corporate image more liberal and democratic. Leaving would only inflict new wounds on the farmers, who have already suffered great losses and may now have to unfairly bear the brunt of the county government’s inability to attract business.
Hon Hai should remain neutral in the land controversy and keep its faith in Taiwan, a nation where wrongs can be righted, and which must ensure that businesses do not act immorally or exploit the less powerful.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS