Legislature must reject ECFA
Now the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) has been signed against the will of the people. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) says the legislature has to vote to ratify or reject the ECFA in its entirety, without amending it article by article. Under the circumstances, the best choice for the legislature is to reject it, for several reasons.
The ECFA was negotiated in complete secrecy. If the ECFA were so beneficial to Taiwan, why did the government have to hide it from the people?
Most Taiwanese are opposed to the signing of the ECFA. Their request for a referendum on the deal was denied. A protest by 150,000 people in a rainy Taipei was ignored by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who went to the south instead. Representing the people, the legislature has an obligation to uphold the will of the people.
The ECFA was signed at gunpoint, with about 1,500 Chinese ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan. Such an “agreement” is not legitimate. What has happened to Ma’s promise not to sign any agreement with China when Taiwan is under threat?
After signing, even Ma admits that China ultimately intends to take over Taiwan in the post-ECFA era. He should also mention that China’s political intentions mirror Ma’s own intention of “eventual unification.”
The ECFA might improve cross-strait relations temporarily, but will lead to economic and political disasters for Taiwan eventually. Taiwanese themselves know much better about the effects of ECFA than the government-solicited foreign advisers did.
When Chinese Nationalists and Chinese Communists collaborate, it is not the time for celebration. Taiwanese have to unite to protect their democracy.
The legislature must exercise its power to reject the ECFA and hold a referendum instead.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Women are not property
I was disgusted with your decision to print Kenneth McCauley’s letter (July 7, page 8).
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, a devotion not to any universal ethical principle but to something as arbitrary as one’s place of birth or the color of one’s skin. Such tribalism is ethically empty and beneath contempt.
So this “MC Hot Dog” feels “sick” when he sees Taiwanese girls dating Westerners? Well, perhaps he ought to be reminded that Taiwanese girls do not belong to him, nor are they the collective “property” of Taiwan or of that organ which purports to speak on behalf of a coerced population, the government. A woman’s choices are her own and a woman’s life is her own — whom she may or may not choose to date is none of his damn business, for she belongs to herself.
Xenophobia is no answer to perceived slights and criticism — and there is much criticism to be offered to Taiwanese people if they are to secure and advance their freedom in the future. The hallmark of Western culture and the scientific and technological progress it has offered the world has always been rational criticism; the irrational dismissal of all such criticism is, and has always been, the hallmark of despots, racists and those so sick of mind as to accept either one.
Yours contemptuously,
Michael Fagan
Tainan
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS