Legislature must reject ECFA
Now the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) has been signed against the will of the people. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) says the legislature has to vote to ratify or reject the ECFA in its entirety, without amending it article by article. Under the circumstances, the best choice for the legislature is to reject it, for several reasons.
The ECFA was negotiated in complete secrecy. If the ECFA were so beneficial to Taiwan, why did the government have to hide it from the people?
Most Taiwanese are opposed to the signing of the ECFA. Their request for a referendum on the deal was denied. A protest by 150,000 people in a rainy Taipei was ignored by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who went to the south instead. Representing the people, the legislature has an obligation to uphold the will of the people.
The ECFA was signed at gunpoint, with about 1,500 Chinese ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan. Such an “agreement” is not legitimate. What has happened to Ma’s promise not to sign any agreement with China when Taiwan is under threat?
After signing, even Ma admits that China ultimately intends to take over Taiwan in the post-ECFA era. He should also mention that China’s political intentions mirror Ma’s own intention of “eventual unification.”
The ECFA might improve cross-strait relations temporarily, but will lead to economic and political disasters for Taiwan eventually. Taiwanese themselves know much better about the effects of ECFA than the government-solicited foreign advisers did.
When Chinese Nationalists and Chinese Communists collaborate, it is not the time for celebration. Taiwanese have to unite to protect their democracy.
The legislature must exercise its power to reject the ECFA and hold a referendum instead.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Women are not property
I was disgusted with your decision to print Kenneth McCauley’s letter (July 7, page 8).
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, a devotion not to any universal ethical principle but to something as arbitrary as one’s place of birth or the color of one’s skin. Such tribalism is ethically empty and beneath contempt.
So this “MC Hot Dog” feels “sick” when he sees Taiwanese girls dating Westerners? Well, perhaps he ought to be reminded that Taiwanese girls do not belong to him, nor are they the collective “property” of Taiwan or of that organ which purports to speak on behalf of a coerced population, the government. A woman’s choices are her own and a woman’s life is her own — whom she may or may not choose to date is none of his damn business, for she belongs to herself.
Xenophobia is no answer to perceived slights and criticism — and there is much criticism to be offered to Taiwanese people if they are to secure and advance their freedom in the future. The hallmark of Western culture and the scientific and technological progress it has offered the world has always been rational criticism; the irrational dismissal of all such criticism is, and has always been, the hallmark of despots, racists and those so sick of mind as to accept either one.
Yours contemptuously,
Michael Fagan
Tainan
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS