The recent suicides of 12 employees at Foxconn factories in Longhua, Guangdong Province have shocked people in Taiwan and China and attracted a lot of global attention.
Hon Hai Group chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) has demonstrated his desire to resolve the issue by coming up with a series of remedies, including a 22 percent pay raise for workers. Senior government officials such as Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) have called on the departments involved to help Gou get things under control.
Because of the division of labor in the global high-tech industry supply chain, most contractors at the bottom of the chain have been forced to move their operations to China to cut costs. Unfortunately wages in China have been rising lately, so much so that when Western companies upstream try to get discounts from companies in China, a process that can sometimes amounts to little more than extortion, contractors lose their profits and the whole situation becomes a vicious circle.
Companies receiving these orders accept labor-intensive jobs that come with delivery terms in order to keep their businesses viable. This also means that employees in these factories have to work overtime, and because their work mostly consists of repetitive tasks on assembly lines, younger employees with lower stress thresholds become easily bored and exhausted. It is precisely this sort of work environment that has seen suicides become a recurring theme.
The “Three D’s” refer to the “dull” work, “dangerous” low-paid jobs and the “dirty” environments low-paid workers are expected to endure. The occupational safety and quality of life of employees would be greatly enhanced if robots could do these repetitive jobs. Robots could work 24-hours a day, which would provide young people with both the opportunities and time to take part in more creative work, which in the long-run would help enhance overall social cohesion.
In January 2007, Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, wrote an article for the Scientific American in which he suggested that robots could become the next computer industry and that their application could eventually be seen in every household. He also encouraged the development of robot software platforms. The research and development lab established by Walt Disney Company and Carnegie Mellon University applies intelligent robot technology to the service sector, including areas such as medicine and home care for the aged and those with disabilities. This area of application is becoming more common worldwide.
Taiwan is very competitive in terms of information and communications technology, integrated circuit design, chip production and computer components, and is therefore well-positioned to develop its own intelligent robot industry. This is a direction we should most definitely explore given labor shortages due a declining birthrate and aging population, the huge demands of newly emerging countries and increased domestic demand. Robots are the most logical way to replace workers engaged in low-paid labor-intensive and dangerous jobs.
Taiwan’s intelligent robot industry is still growing and if we can dedicate more resources, increase the development of key technologies and optimize the conditions needed to develop the industry, while strengthening the quality of available technical training available, we will come out ahead. Establishing a firm foundation for the industry’s development would help it become the next trillion dollar sector for Taiwan while also allowing it to gain a major stake in the international market.
Ren Luo is a professor of electrical engineering at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS