In a spacious but frugal office in Kuwait, a glossy catalogue lists the dozens of reasons why Kuwait and Iraq are still at daggers drawn after all these years.
Sheikha Hussa Salem al-Sabah thumbs through the pages of the booklet, pointing out the most egregious cases — page upon page of priceless treasures looted by former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein’s invading army 20 years ago and still missing: a dazzling 234-carat emerald the size of a paperweight; a slightly smaller gem inscribed with exquisite Arabic calligraphy; Moghul-era ruby beads.
“The Iraqis still don’t understand the damage they did to us, not just financially, but for our souls,” says the daughter-in-law of Kuwaiti Emir Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, who maintains the dynasty’s heirlooms. “It was emotionally wrenching and still is.”
Though many of the priceless treasures have been returned to the collection in the bitter decades since, up to 57 remain missing — perhaps lost for ever. At the National Museum across town, they report that the whereabouts of another 487 treasures remain unknown.
Many of the pieces, Kuwaitis believe, now form the core of private collections in post-Saddam Iraq and around the Arab world. To the victims of the 1990 invasion, they remain the central reason of a failure to close the unfinished business of the first Gulf war — just as the second one is beginning to wind down.
In the seven years since Saddam was ousted, Iraq has been obliged to settle UN-prescribed debts of US$43 billion and compensation to private families totaling several hundred million dollars more, before being welcomed as a full-fledged member of the so-called community of nations.
It is a burden that has proven difficult to bear for a brittle state still ravaged by war and chaos and deeply resentful of the fact that Kuwait was not invaded in the name of the current regime in Iraq.
To Iraq’s wealthy southern neighbor though, the desire to reclaim what was lost still burns strong.
“This is about principle,” Sheikha Hussa said. “This is part of Kuwait’s rights and we will continue to press them.”
At the National Museum, lost artifacts mainly date from the Moghul dynasty and include around 20 gold bracelets, necklaces and ankle rings, pottery, arrow heads and Korans.
Staff handed over a list of stolen loot and mentioned a theory often discussed in Kuwait that much of what was stolen remains in a warehouse north of Baghdad, where it is being used as leverage in any eventual settlement between the two countries.
Three months of inquiries by the Guardian with officials in Iraq’s government, military and police seem to rule out that there is such a repository.
“Anything that was stolen was taken to Saddam’s palaces and the offices of his high officials,” one Kuwaiti member of parliament said. “There were antique cars stolen by Uday [Hussein, Saddam’s psychopath son] that were sold in Europe at auction, paintings and heirlooms, but after the American invasion it was a free-for-all. Everything was stolen again then and there was no control over who took it, or where it went.”
Between the first and second Gulf wars, there were attempts by Saddam’s regime to put things right, with Kuwaiti officials being invited to the National Museum of Iraq in Baghdad to reclaim stolen Kuwaiti pieces.
The private art world also turned up the occasional treasure. In 1996, a jewel-encrusted Moghul dagger, which had been at Sotheby’s, was returned to the Dar-al-Athar collection. Financial compensation has been paid, according to Sheikha Hussa, but the repatriation of priceless pieces has been rare.
Two years ago, parts of a giant archive of Kuwait’s history, known as the Prince’s Archive, were returned from Baghdad after being kept in the home of a civil servant who had little idea of the value of his souvenirs.
Iraq hopes that a steady repayment of the billions it owes will boost its credentials and stop Kuwait from pressing claims through international courts for the seizure of Iraqi assets.
Twice in recent months the state-owned Kuwait Airways has moved to seize an Iraqi Airways plane that had landed in London as part of a new passenger route from Baghdad. That action has led Iraq to suspend the route only weeks after it was opened.
Iraq’s monthly repayments are pegged by the UN at 5 percent of its oil revenue.
“Last month they paid US$520 million as part of the United Nations Compensation Commission obligations,” said the chairman of a Kuwaiti public authority established to process compensation claims from Iraq’s invasion. “They have been cooperating with us in meetings lately, but it takes time, it will need another generation to forget. There are also the remains of fallen soldiers and POWs yet to be returned.”
In Baghdad, Iraqi parliamentary speaker Ayad al-Sammaraie said things were now moving quicker than at any other time since 1990.
“Now both countries are willing to sort things. But there is still a remaining bitterness. Resolving this is very complicated and needs a realistic perspective,” he said.
“Our fishermen are worried at repeated interceptions by the Kuwaitis in the Gulf. Our farmers in the south are worried about border claims. And we are concerned about having good relations again,” he said.
Asked about the ancient treasures that in some ways hold the key to goodwill, he said: “There was no [sovereign] Iraq from 2003 for three years and we had no ability to look for them. But really, Iraq is sincere and willing to return them.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath