Taiwan’s environment is a sensitive topic, as seen by the controversy over the transformation of the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) into a biotech park. When this biotech park for Academia Sinica was being planned, I was responsible for seeking government approval to build a new synchrotron radiation facility called the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS), in Hsinchu. I therefore know a bit about what the government was thinking concerning the development of Taiwan’s science parks.
The recent completion of Taiwan’s high speed rail has greatly shortened the time needed for business to be conducted along the west coast. Even more importantly, now that Hsinchu Science Park, Central Taiwan Science Park and Southern Taiwan Science Park have all been linked for daily round-trip operations, the government hopes that the high speed rail can be used to enhance the creativity and vitality of Taiwan’s biotech industry.
When the site of the new TPS facility was being negotiated with the Council for Economic Planning and Development and the Environmental Protection Administration, planning was already underway for the high speed rail line to be extended to the 202 Munitions Works site. At that time, Academia Sinica had also just finished building the National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine. If these facilities were coupled with the proposed biotech park, the Nankang area would become an innovative think tank for Taiwan’s pharmaceutical industry.
The government also hoped that the cutting-edge biotech facilities developed at TPS could become the heart of research and development operations. The research findings made in the north could then be transmitted to Kaohsiung Biotechnology Park with the aid of the high speed rail network.
The proposal for the construction of TPS experienced many setbacks, but we eventually managed to settle its location in Hsinchu, next to National Tsing Hua University and National Chiao Tung University. It should be stressed that without these two leading research universities, the synchrotron would not be able to perform the central, leading role it was designed to do. Similarly, if Academia Sinica’s National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine does not have a biotech park nearby, it will not be able to perform as an innovative think tank-like organization. Luckily, construction has already started on the TPS, with a construction budget of NT$7 billion (US$218 million). Let us hope that the issue of the 202 Munitions Works can also be settled as soon as possible.
Academia Sinica at Nangang has gathered together a group of 200 to 300 holders of doctorates in biotechnology, after years of effort. In the past two years, Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-Huey (翁啟惠), has talked about the future of a biotech park at Academia Sinica. He envisions using the new park as an opportunity to invite a new generation of Taiwanese students studying abroad back to Taiwan, as the addition of these biotech experts would inject new vitality into Taiwan’s biotech industry. The history of science and technology has shown us that in many innovation parks in advanced nations, research staff often make the greatest discoveries when they least expect to, with innovative ideas springing forward in an environment where research staff can chat freely.
For this to happen, a culture of interaction is vital. The National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine at Academia Sinica already has some of the world’s finest laboratories, as well as many world-class research centers. It would be best if the future biotech park could be built at the site of the 202 Munitions Works, as it is situated next door to Academia Sinica. In this regard, we should remember those Taiwanese students who studied overseas and returned to Taiwan in the 1970s and 1980s. These returnees mostly settled in the Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park. An industry cluster was created there, and it was this cluster effect that gave birth to Taiwan’s extremely successful semiconductor industry.
Lately, Wong has said that South Korea’s patent rights for pharmaceutical manufacturing are already way ahead of Taiwan’s. Over the past decade, I have often traveled between South Korea, Japan and Taiwan and have noticed that we are falling behind these countries, as we lack the strategic foresight and vigor to forge a new path forward.
The differences between Japan, South Korea and Taiwan can be seen in the innovation and research park that is being developed on a mountain range in the suburbs of Sejong City, South Korea, to commemorate the rulers of the Yi dynasty who laid the foundations for scientific research in that country 600 years ago. Here in Taiwan, however, people are still arguing over where to build our new biotech park.
The construction of modern science and technology parks can absolutely coexist with the natural environment, the Harima Science Garden City of Japan’s Hyogo Prefecture being a prime example. Given the high level of environmental awareness Taipei residents have, we should have the utmost confidence that the 9.6 hectare piece of land the 202 Munitions Works stands on can be developed in harmony with its natural surroundings. In addition, biotechnology is a form of green technology characterized by low levels of pollution that can benefit the health of humankind and contribute to the biodiversity of our planet.
As countries around the world are investing large amounts of money getting biotech experts to help them with the development of their industries, we are running out of time to lay the foundations for the next 50 years of Taiwan’s economic development.
Keng Liang is the former director of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS