Taiwan’s environment is a sensitive topic, as seen by the controversy over the transformation of the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) into a biotech park. When this biotech park for Academia Sinica was being planned, I was responsible for seeking government approval to build a new synchrotron radiation facility called the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS), in Hsinchu. I therefore know a bit about what the government was thinking concerning the development of Taiwan’s science parks.
The recent completion of Taiwan’s high speed rail has greatly shortened the time needed for business to be conducted along the west coast. Even more importantly, now that Hsinchu Science Park, Central Taiwan Science Park and Southern Taiwan Science Park have all been linked for daily round-trip operations, the government hopes that the high speed rail can be used to enhance the creativity and vitality of Taiwan’s biotech industry.
When the site of the new TPS facility was being negotiated with the Council for Economic Planning and Development and the Environmental Protection Administration, planning was already underway for the high speed rail line to be extended to the 202 Munitions Works site. At that time, Academia Sinica had also just finished building the National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine. If these facilities were coupled with the proposed biotech park, the Nankang area would become an innovative think tank for Taiwan’s pharmaceutical industry.
The government also hoped that the cutting-edge biotech facilities developed at TPS could become the heart of research and development operations. The research findings made in the north could then be transmitted to Kaohsiung Biotechnology Park with the aid of the high speed rail network.
The proposal for the construction of TPS experienced many setbacks, but we eventually managed to settle its location in Hsinchu, next to National Tsing Hua University and National Chiao Tung University. It should be stressed that without these two leading research universities, the synchrotron would not be able to perform the central, leading role it was designed to do. Similarly, if Academia Sinica’s National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine does not have a biotech park nearby, it will not be able to perform as an innovative think tank-like organization. Luckily, construction has already started on the TPS, with a construction budget of NT$7 billion (US$218 million). Let us hope that the issue of the 202 Munitions Works can also be settled as soon as possible.
Academia Sinica at Nangang has gathered together a group of 200 to 300 holders of doctorates in biotechnology, after years of effort. In the past two years, Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-Huey (翁啟惠), has talked about the future of a biotech park at Academia Sinica. He envisions using the new park as an opportunity to invite a new generation of Taiwanese students studying abroad back to Taiwan, as the addition of these biotech experts would inject new vitality into Taiwan’s biotech industry. The history of science and technology has shown us that in many innovation parks in advanced nations, research staff often make the greatest discoveries when they least expect to, with innovative ideas springing forward in an environment where research staff can chat freely.
For this to happen, a culture of interaction is vital. The National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine at Academia Sinica already has some of the world’s finest laboratories, as well as many world-class research centers. It would be best if the future biotech park could be built at the site of the 202 Munitions Works, as it is situated next door to Academia Sinica. In this regard, we should remember those Taiwanese students who studied overseas and returned to Taiwan in the 1970s and 1980s. These returnees mostly settled in the Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park. An industry cluster was created there, and it was this cluster effect that gave birth to Taiwan’s extremely successful semiconductor industry.
Lately, Wong has said that South Korea’s patent rights for pharmaceutical manufacturing are already way ahead of Taiwan’s. Over the past decade, I have often traveled between South Korea, Japan and Taiwan and have noticed that we are falling behind these countries, as we lack the strategic foresight and vigor to forge a new path forward.
The differences between Japan, South Korea and Taiwan can be seen in the innovation and research park that is being developed on a mountain range in the suburbs of Sejong City, South Korea, to commemorate the rulers of the Yi dynasty who laid the foundations for scientific research in that country 600 years ago. Here in Taiwan, however, people are still arguing over where to build our new biotech park.
The construction of modern science and technology parks can absolutely coexist with the natural environment, the Harima Science Garden City of Japan’s Hyogo Prefecture being a prime example. Given the high level of environmental awareness Taipei residents have, we should have the utmost confidence that the 9.6 hectare piece of land the 202 Munitions Works stands on can be developed in harmony with its natural surroundings. In addition, biotechnology is a form of green technology characterized by low levels of pollution that can benefit the health of humankind and contribute to the biodiversity of our planet.
As countries around the world are investing large amounts of money getting biotech experts to help them with the development of their industries, we are running out of time to lay the foundations for the next 50 years of Taiwan’s economic development.
Keng Liang is the former director of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS