Hon Hai Group (鴻海集團) has announced two salary raises in a week for its Foxconn plant in Shenzhen, resulting in a total raise of 122 percent. The event has shaken the Taiwanese stock market, shocked Taiwanese businesspeople along the southern China coast and changed the environment for China’s export-oriented processing industry. Many Taiwanese investors and other foreign businesspeople now worry that the era when China was a low-cost paradise has come to an end with Hon Hai’s massive salary increases.
Contract manufacturers rely on low labor costs to make relatively small profits. However, when a society has developed to a certain level, labor costs increase. This means that businesses cannot continue to rely on low costs alone to make a profit. The fact is that industries in coastal areas of China have experienced a series of collective demands for salary increases. Workers at Honda’s Chinese plants are striking for higher salaries and those at a Taiwanese-invested mechanical plant in Kunshan in Jiangsu Province went on strike last Saturday, demanding pay raises and an improved work environment. The number of workers on strike soon reached 1,000 and they have refused to leave despite efforts by the police to disperse them. Not until the company’s chairman promised to raise salaries and improve the quality of food and the work environment did the strike end.
Some people are guessing that Hon Hai’s highly unusual double pay raise may be the result of Chinese government pressure and others think China wants to get rid of Hon Hai and let a local Chinese company take over as the king of contract manufacturers. However, there is currently nothing to back up either viewpoint.
Hon Hai is the first company to react to the calls of Chinese workers for higher pay. In this context the raises are both a passive, defensive measure and an aggressive strategic attempt to deal with a new situation.
On the one hand, the raise counteracts the negative impact of the 12 suicides at Foxconn’s Shenzhen plant, as it may improve morale among workers and alleviate concerns that Foxconn is a sweatshop. Labor stability will probably be higher than before the problems began and production will also become more predictable, which will result in higher productivity.
On the other hand, Hon Hai sold its worker dormitories to the local government and then raised salaries to subsidize workers renting their accommodation from the government. This also means that the company has passed the hot issue of the workers’ leisure time on to the government and it no longer has to take responsibility for its workers’ lives. The initiative to raise salaries will increase public income and raise workers’ buying power, and that will help the company enter the 3C — computer, communication and consumer electronics — market. When a market leader such as Hon Hai offers such massive salary increases, it puts great pressure on other electronics companies and might even force competitors out of the market. In addition, the increased expenditure can be passed on to US, EU and Japanese companies so that it does not affect Hon Hai’s profits. The move could even turn out to be a crucial first step toward the transformation of China’s labor-intensive industries.
Another side effect of the big raise could be that some Taiwanese companies see more clearly the uncertainties of the Chinese market and decide to return to Taiwan to invest in automated plants. If that is the case, then Taiwan should thank Terry Gou (郭台銘) for such an unexpected gift.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS