In 2008, President and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) expressed the hope that the KMT’s Youth Corps could “produce a [Chinese President] Hu Jintao” (胡錦濤). A classic remark, indeed, in view of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) bloody history and the fact that it still has more than 1,000 missiles targeting Taiwan. Ma’s hopes that the KMT can produce a communist-style leader reveals a complete ignorance of what “evil” means.
He is not alone. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently praised Hu as being “rational” and “kind.” It is worrying that Taiwan’s two main political leaders hold such romantic views of Chinese communist rule.
Dictators are neither kind nor reasonable because a dictatorship is synonymous with violent rule. Hu had blood on his hands even before he became president. Just before the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, a protest broke out in Lhasa, and reports said hundreds of Tibetans may have been killed in the military crackdown. At the time, Hu was CCP party secretary in the Tibet Autonomous Region.
After he became president, the human rights situation in China has become even worse than under his predecessor, Jiang Zemin (江澤民). The persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, Christians and dissidents has intensified, as has the suppression of Tibetans and Uighurs. The CCP has also tightened its control over information and freedom of thought.
Nor has Hu displayed reason or kindness in the wake of the recent sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan.
On May 20, an investigation team consisting of Swedish, British, Australian, Canadian and US experts released a report saying there was overwhelming evidence a North Korean submarine sank the ship on March 26, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
The international community condemned North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s regime. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called it an invasion, Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama called it an unforgivable act, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs William Hague said North Korea lacked respect for human life and Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd accused it of publicly violating the UN Charter and the armistice agreement between the two Koreas. Even the normally wishy-washy UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the investigation findings “very disturbing.”
The Chinese government, however, has gone against international opinion. At the latest meeting between foreign ministers from China, Japan and South Korea, the Chinese minister said investigations should be “scientific and objective.” He did not condemn North Korea, and his tone implied that Beijing is preparing to challenge the investigation in favor of North Korea.
After the sinking of the Cheonan, Kim rushed off to Beijing, clearly to discuss with Hu how to handle the incident. Perhaps Hu encouraged Kim and offered Beijing’s support.
Clinton visited Beijing this week before heading to South Korea, possibly to persuade Hu not to favor Pyongyang since South Korea is preparing to seek redress through the UN Security Council.
When the report by the foreign team of experts came out, South Korea’s foreign ministry invited the ambassadors from China, Japan, Russia, the UK, France and about 30 other countries to attend the announcement of the results. Chinese Ambassador to Seoul Zhang Xinsen (張鑫森) declined the invitation. South Korean analysts believed Zhang was acting alone, while instead he represented the position of the Chinese. This could mean that Beijing might use its veto power in the Security Council to block sanctions against North Korea.
The only reason this evil little North Korean dares behave in this outrageous manner is because he has the backing of the big Chinese dictatorship. Hu has said in public that “China must learn from Cuba and North Korea,” as if China isn’t evil enough. Kim and Hu have once again proved that dictators are unreasonable. For democratic Taiwan to nurture illusions about a dictator is very dangerous.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PERRY SVENSSON
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS