In 2008, President and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) expressed the hope that the KMT’s Youth Corps could “produce a [Chinese President] Hu Jintao” (胡錦濤). A classic remark, indeed, in view of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) bloody history and the fact that it still has more than 1,000 missiles targeting Taiwan. Ma’s hopes that the KMT can produce a communist-style leader reveals a complete ignorance of what “evil” means.
He is not alone. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently praised Hu as being “rational” and “kind.” It is worrying that Taiwan’s two main political leaders hold such romantic views of Chinese communist rule.
Dictators are neither kind nor reasonable because a dictatorship is synonymous with violent rule. Hu had blood on his hands even before he became president. Just before the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, a protest broke out in Lhasa, and reports said hundreds of Tibetans may have been killed in the military crackdown. At the time, Hu was CCP party secretary in the Tibet Autonomous Region.
After he became president, the human rights situation in China has become even worse than under his predecessor, Jiang Zemin (江澤民). The persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, Christians and dissidents has intensified, as has the suppression of Tibetans and Uighurs. The CCP has also tightened its control over information and freedom of thought.
Nor has Hu displayed reason or kindness in the wake of the recent sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan.
On May 20, an investigation team consisting of Swedish, British, Australian, Canadian and US experts released a report saying there was overwhelming evidence a North Korean submarine sank the ship on March 26, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
The international community condemned North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s regime. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called it an invasion, Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama called it an unforgivable act, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs William Hague said North Korea lacked respect for human life and Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd accused it of publicly violating the UN Charter and the armistice agreement between the two Koreas. Even the normally wishy-washy UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the investigation findings “very disturbing.”
The Chinese government, however, has gone against international opinion. At the latest meeting between foreign ministers from China, Japan and South Korea, the Chinese minister said investigations should be “scientific and objective.” He did not condemn North Korea, and his tone implied that Beijing is preparing to challenge the investigation in favor of North Korea.
After the sinking of the Cheonan, Kim rushed off to Beijing, clearly to discuss with Hu how to handle the incident. Perhaps Hu encouraged Kim and offered Beijing’s support.
Clinton visited Beijing this week before heading to South Korea, possibly to persuade Hu not to favor Pyongyang since South Korea is preparing to seek redress through the UN Security Council.
When the report by the foreign team of experts came out, South Korea’s foreign ministry invited the ambassadors from China, Japan, Russia, the UK, France and about 30 other countries to attend the announcement of the results. Chinese Ambassador to Seoul Zhang Xinsen (張鑫森) declined the invitation. South Korean analysts believed Zhang was acting alone, while instead he represented the position of the Chinese. This could mean that Beijing might use its veto power in the Security Council to block sanctions against North Korea.
The only reason this evil little North Korean dares behave in this outrageous manner is because he has the backing of the big Chinese dictatorship. Hu has said in public that “China must learn from Cuba and North Korea,” as if China isn’t evil enough. Kim and Hu have once again proved that dictators are unreasonable. For democratic Taiwan to nurture illusions about a dictator is very dangerous.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PERRY SVENSSON
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS