To mark his two years in office, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has built two new castles in the sky: a “golden decade” and a “six country” goal — building a strong country based on innovation, reviving the country by promoting culture, initiating environmental protection measures to save the country, consolidating the country with constitutional politics, promoting social welfare to make the country more secure and ensuring peace to protect the country.
Ma is promising Taiwan a bed of roses, but apart from piling beautiful but empty words on top of each other, his “six country” goals offer no substantive policy suggestions. The public response seems to be: “Here he goes again, yet another example of government by slogan.”
Following the 10 infrastructure projects during the reign of Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has promoted other national construction projects, including manufacturing centers, sea cargo transshipment centers, air cargo transshipment centers, financial centers, telecommunications centers, media centers and other Asia-Pacific regional operations centers as a strategy to bring Taiwan into the 21st century. They have all been economic illusions that have died an early death.
Premiers under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government also offered their visions, but their plans were shelved when they left office.
When the government puts forward grand plans, the goal always seems to be to mislead voters — the grander the promise, the greater the chance it will come to naught. The most obvious example is Ma’s election promise that he would create 6 percent annual economic growth, reduce unemployment to 3 percent and bring about a per capita income of US$30,000. After his election, economic growth figures have been dropping and unemployment has gone up. Instead of living up to his promise that everything would be fine if he were elected, every election promise has been broken, but he has not seen fit to apologize to the public for the great discrepancy between his promises and reality.
Ma’s six country statement is meant to sound good, but it is unlikely that it will stand the test of time. As environmental activists demand that the wetlands at the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) — often referred to as the last lung of Taipei — be saved, the government’s decision to turn it into a technology park is diametrically opposed to the part of the six country statement that talks about “initiating environmental protection measures.”
There are also contradictions between the statement and how the administration ignores public opposition and the impact of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) on small and medium enterprises and disadvantaged industries, how it further aggravates the unemployment situation and how it hurts Taiwan’s sovereignty and strategic position in the international arena. Disregarding the deadlock and delays in the ECFA negotiation process, the government insists that the agreement will be signed next month.
Ma’s “golden decade” is even more incomprehensible. Two years remain in Ma’s term, so even if he were re-elected, he would only have six years. He is thus passing responsibility for four to eight years of his plan to the next president, or even presidents. How can a vision with so many holes in it be implemented? Given Ma’s incompetence and lack of credibility, who will believe him? His “golden decade” is simply an inferior rip-off of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 10-year party program.
Ma has bragged too much and done too little about his castles in the sky and he is incapable of controlling and completing the projects. As a result, his approval ratings continue to hover around 30 percent. After two years in office, Ma remains incapable of self-criticism and he is resorting to government by slogan. Only this time, no one will believe him.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS