Hesham Shashaa looked twice at the display on his cellphone, staring at the number.
“It’s either a person who needs help or someone who wants to kill me,” he said.
Shashaa, an imam at the Darul Quran mosque in Munich, follows the strictest form of Islam, Salafi. But the people who want to kill him are Muslims.
“They use the religion for their personal aims and declare war on Jews and Christians, but I want people to follow what Islam really says,” said Shashaa, who with his beard and traditional clothes has sometimes been likened to Osama bin Laden.
His philosophy, however, is quite different.
A growing number of imams in Europe and the Middle East have denounced suicide missions and terrorist acts. Many of these imams, however, still view al-Qaeda, the Taliban or Hamas as legitimate resistance movements, while Shashaa openly declares that they are violating the tenets of Islam.
FIGHTING BACK
He travels to mosques and madrasah throughout Europe, as well as the Middle East and Pakistan, telling young Muslims that fighting against US troops and other forces is a violation of their religion. He condemns militant recruiters in his sermons, urges worshipers at Friday prayer to call the police if they hear about plans for an attack and readily talks with law enforcement officials about the reasons for radicalization and the best way to combat it.
“We cannot just sit down and let other people hijack our religion,” he said in an interview.
Threats come with the territory, so now Shashaa travels with former students who act as his bodyguards.
“This man is a traitor,” wrote one critic in a posting on a jihadist Web site.
“He needs a lesson,” said another, who published pictures of Shashaa meeting with police officers.
He has a complex relationship with German law enforcement officials, who see his message as crucial and unique here and continually press him to do more.
“We know that he speaks and works against terrorism groups like al-Qaeda or the Taliban, and that is important,” said a senior German security official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to make official statements about Shashaa. “He is the only example who is doing it in this way here in Germany, and in this sense he is effective.”
At the same time, Shashaa said, he must keep the trust of his congregants, who feel singled out by law enforcement agencies.
Recently, his own mosque was searched by law enforcement officials who were looking for a specific book about women in Islam that is not allowed in Germany, a Munich security official said. Shashaa confirmed that he had the book in his library.
“Of course I had it,” he said. “I need to know what is in these books. How else will I know how to argue with recruiters?”
Shashaa, the child of a Palestinian father and an Egyptian mother, was born and educated in Egypt, where he worked for a time as a journalist. He is in his 50s, though he is evasive about his age because he does not want young people to think that he is too old to understand them.
He has three wives, marrying the later two in ceremonies recognized by his mosque if not the state. The wives and 10 children all live in his Munich home. Shashaa said he had not intended to end up in Germany. But he lost his briefcase there on a 2000 stopover while on his way to Britain from Romania, where he had been living.
“Everything was gone, the papers, the money,” he said. “So I thought it was God’s will that I should stay here.”
He has won over some people who say they had intended to wage jihad against the West, including one of his bodyguards, who would appear to be a dream recruit for any militant group.
The bodyguard, Abu Khalid, 36, served in the Jordanian army, excels in taekwondo and has extensive knowledge of weapons.
After moving to Germany from Jordan and France in the 1990s, Khalid said, “I got into some circles where people talked about jihad and thought I had to defend my brothers and sisters in Iraq.”
Looking for an imam who would back his mission, he met Shashaa, who introduced him to the teachings of Islamic scholars who opposed violence.
“Then I realized that I was on the wrong path,” Khalid said.
Shashaa talks with regret about the young men he could not dissuade, including a 19-year-old of Tunisian descent, who lived in northern Germany. Visiting the young man’s mosque, he sat talking with him and two children.
“They were just talking about war and killing of unbelievers,” he said, shaking his head. “They were totally brainwashed.”
Later, Shashaa said, a friend told him that the young man was killed in Iraq in 2005.
Eight months ago, Shashaa traveled to Pakistan, where he visited madrasah and mosques, talking about jihad. He videotaped some of his sessions, which he showed the New York Times.
One session featured an angry student asking him, “Isn’t it our duty to support our brothers from al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the jihad against the American occupation in Afghanistan?”
Shashaa listened and then said that jihad was part of the Koran and allowed for self-defense.
“But it must be the head of state or caliphate who announces jihad,” he said. “It can’t be someone like bin Laden or Mullah Omar who declares jihad,” a reference to the leaders of al-Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban. “What they do is not jihad.”
In response, one man stood up and shouted, “I swear to God, you should be killed.”
Shashaa let the man finish before replying: “If you can show me in the Koran or Sunnah that I am wrong,” he said, referring to the sacred book of Islam and its prophetic traditions, “I will be the first one who would take a gun and join them, but you won’t be able to find something like that.”
FROM EXPERIENCE
Shashaa knows about the fascination that militant groups can hold. As a young man in Egypt, he said, he sought answers in a variety of movements: communism, Sufism, the Muslim Brotherhood and even jihadist groups.
Eventually, he said, he concluded that most of the young people attracted to the groups “did not ask any questions, as if they had closed eyes.”
That is why Shashaa is convinced that people like him, who know how the members of groups like al-Qaeda work and think, have the best chance of reaching young people who are drawn to these networks.
“If I would not have a long beard and not have this knowledge, do you think anyone would follow or believe me?” he said.
Just as he accepts the complications of his relations with some German law enforcement officials, he accepts that other Germans he meets on the street are likely to look at him with suspicion. He counters with courtesy and, at times, with humor.
With a smile in his face and a slight Bavarian accent, he offers the typical Bavarian greeting: “Gruss Gott,” or greet God.
After the Sept. 11 attacks in the US, people in Munich would often shout “Hey, bin Laden!” to him.
So he wore a piece of paper around his neck that said: “I am not Osama bin Laden. I am Hesham Shashaa.”
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS