While EU finance ministers burnt the midnight oil in their desperate search for a solution to the euro crisis, they knew they were in the next and potentially most damaging phase of the financial crisis that has gripped world markets since the summer of 2007.
At the very least, the stakes were as high as they were in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. After the global markets closed on Friday night last week, policymakers were alarmed by a number of factors, not least that trading volumes were high and there were signs that the banking system was seized with panic as it was three years ago. In London, stock market selling was taking place in volumes last seen during the middle of the Lehman crisis. Financial instruments, which help gauge traders’ predictions about the risk of countries and banks defaulting, were reflecting anxiety that a second stage of the credit crunch was developing.
The 110 billion euro (US$140 billion) bailout of Greece announced the week before had not been enough to stop markets worrying about “contagion.” Traders believed that other indebted countries such as Ireland, Portugal and Spain would suffer the same fate as Greece, where the severity of austerity measures has caused rioting on the streets and the deaths of three bank workers. In another echo of the Lehman Brothers debacle, the “who’s next” mentality gripped traders, flooring HBOS in the UK, AIG in the US and three weeks later Royal Bank of Scotland back on this side of the Atlantic. Countries, not consumers and banks, were in the sights of the markets this time.
On Monday, at least, the market was relieved by the outcome of the EU negotiations — which lasted until 2am early that day as eurozone ministers tried to convince the UK to participate in the emergency fund. The European Central Bank (ECB) had heeded desperate calls by dealers to start buying government bonds to inject liquidity into markets but has also set up an emergency fund in readiness for countries next at risk of default on their debt.
Marco Annunziata, chief economist for UniCredit Group, said: “The decision took much longer than expected, but for once the scope of the actions unveiled dwarfed previous leaks and speculation: This is shock and awe, part II and in 3D.”
“This truly is overwhelming force and should be more than sufficient to stabilize markets in the near term, prevent panic and contain the risk of contagion,” he added.
Central banks around the world stepped in to prop up the markets and even Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) opined on the importance of the international effort. “If certain developed countries are not able to effectively cut down expenditures and increase revenues, the possibility that the sovereign debt crisis might spread globally cannot be ruled out,” he said.
Long-standing market participants and experts felt that ever since the problems in Greece emerged, policymakers in the EU had been unable to keep pace with the markets’ concerns and reactions — just as in the aftermath of Lehman Brothers’ collapse.
Nick Parsons, head of strategy at National Australia Bank, said that the measures unveiled to the markets yesterday had now put the policymakers “significantly ahead of the markets during which period we can have a period of fiscal adjustment.”
It is a sentiment echoed by Howard Archer, chief Europe economist of IHS Global Insight. “People are looking at this in the light of Lehman,” he said. “There had been a drip-drip policy response to the Greek situation and there was a perception that the authorities were behind the curve. This has been more gradual [than Lehman] but Greece has been the trigger for all this.”
As long ago as January, there had been concerns that Greece could be the “next Lehman Brothers” — such is the fear in which the collapse of the Wall Street bank is held by markets.
Back then, Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income research at brokers Evolution, predicted: “If the lack of investor confidence leads to funding problems in Greece, market participants will look around and ask themselves the question ‘what looks like Greece?’ Is it Portugal, Italy, Spain? This is where potentially Greece could become the next Lehman’s as investors move from one target to the next just like they did in the banking crises of 2008.”
Yesterday Jenkins said that by the end of last week it had become all apparent that Portugal and Spain were on the brink of joining Greece “in the unable to borrow in the markets club.”
“After total inaction from the ECB, the situation had deteriorated and there was the potential for a complete meltdown in the market this week,” he said.
Hence the need for urgent and decisive action by the EU, particularly as banks had been buying Portuguese and Spanish bonds to help bolster their returns and now faced huge losses.
“That is one of the reasons why the EU has had to provide such a massive support package now. It is not just trying to save the banking sector, but it is saving the government bond sector, and therefore itself,” Jenkins said.
The key question in the market, just as it was after governments around the world bailed out their banks after Lehman collapsed, is this: How long will the emergency measures last before a new crisis erupts? The taxpayer bailout of the banks was followed a few months later by schemes to protect banks from the bad debts — the troubled asset relief program in the US and the asset protection scheme in the UK.
Geoffrey Wood, professor of economics at Cass Business School, is scathing about the deal.
“They haven’t addressed the fundamental problems. They haven’t fiscal transfers and they haven’t thought through how to handle differences in productivity,” Wood said.
Parsons reckons the EU has given itself a year’s breathing space while Simon Ward of the fund management group Henderson notes it will “suppress contagion and ease near-term financing but does not remove longer-term solvency concerns.”
Market experts note that while there have been some dramatic recoveries in markets — French and German stock markets have rallied more than 8 percent — other indicators about sentiment are less vitriolic. The much-watched rate at which banks lend to each other in the money markets — known as the three-month sterling LIBOR — remained at elevated levels yesterday. A sign, perhaps, of the nervousness that remains.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath