The draft statute to promote innovative industries that has been hotly debated lately is essentially an extension of the tax incentives and industrial park development plan of the now-invalidated Statute for Upgrading Industry (促進產業升級條例). In addition to revenue losses due to the government’s constant submission to corporations, Article 10 of the draft statute, which deals with the establishment of industrial parks, is even more worrying. The article is basically an extension of Article 5 of the Statute for Upgrading Industry, which dealt with the establishment of industrial districts. If passed, the draft statute will create four major changes to the application process for setting up industrial parks.
First, anyone will be able to apply to set up an industrial park, be they central or local governments or a private individual. Second, the draft statute places no restrictions on land use. Applicants would be able to do as they please, including activities such as building banks and reclaiming land, practically creating their own kingdom. Third, the draft bypasses regulations in other laws such as the Land Act (土地法), Regional Planning Act (區域計畫法), Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法), National Property Act (國有財產法) and the act on handling public property. Lastly, the draft allows for the expropriation of private land and the sale of state-owned land.
Furthermore, the government ignores the high ratio of unused land, low occupancy rates and low plot ratios in existing industrial and science parks and refuses to consider how to make better use of this already-developed land. Instead, the government wastes land and resources by unnecessarily setting up new parks using large plots which will eventually take over all state-owned land.
It is very contradictory, then, that a draft of the National Land Plan is scheduled for review during the current legislative session. The principles and guidelines for national land plans are based on functional land zoning to provide a basis for the management and direction for the land’s proper use and conservation.
The government is thus planning a land plan law to protect land while, on the other hand, using the draft statute for industries to allow applicants to use industrial parks and state-owned land any way they want, essentially turning the former into a joke.
The draft statute allows those applying to set up industrial parks to take over agricultural and coastal land. Furthermore, problems with planning will continue to get worse under this draft and jeopardize attempts to secure land for agriculture, and safeguard our marine environment.
Local governments will also be given more power, making land speculation and the expropriation of large swathes of private land more certain. It is hard to say how much rural land would be expropriated, how rural society would disintegrate, how many farmers would lose their homes and how much land would become idle from this.
Finally, the draft statute highlights two major issues — the Statute for Upgrading Industry made the government serve big business for a long time. Even worse, after being in Taiwan for decades, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government still only serves this group and uses land resources and local factions to establish collaborative relationships with industries, refusing to be humble and identify with Taiwan.
The draft statute to promote innovative industries will have a severe impact and we cannot afford to sit around. We must stand up and take action together.
Liao Pen-chuan is an associate professor in the department of real estate and built environment at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
RSS