Over the past few decades, Haiti has been battered by numerous natural disasters, almost every one of which resulted in heavy human casualties and destruction of property.
People familiar with Haiti’s history have pointed out that while hurricanes that swept across the country in 2008 killed more than 1,000 people, storms of similar intensity that hit Cuba claimed just four victims.
The reason is that the two countries differ in their resilience in the face of unpredictable natural disasters because of their economic, social and physical conditions.
Haiti has never managed to establish such social resilience, or, rather, the foreign powers that dominate it have not allowed it to do so.
Haiti is often labeled “the poorest country in the Western hemisphere.” Among its population of 9 million, 75 percent live on less than US$2 a day.
A majority of Haitians depend for their day-to-day survival on remittances from friends and relatives who live abroad. Statistics show that remittances from Haitians living overseas — estimated at between 1 million and 2 million — account for approximately 30 percent of the country’s gross national product, more than double the amount generated by total export revenue.
Without doubt, poverty is one of the main reasons for the high death toll following the recent earthquake.
The earthquake killed an estimated 150,000 people in the capital, Port-au-Prince, alone.
Most of the crowded city’s 2 million residents have over the past decades been forced by economic policies dictated by powerful countries, especially the US, to leave their home villages and go to the capital in search of work.
Some commentators even assert that transnational capital intentionally concentrated this population in Port-au-Prince in order to maintain a pool of cheap labor.
These poor people generally live in the most dilapidated and unsafe houses, and they often live on high-risk slopes. When disasters strike, they are very vulnerable.
Ever since the US invaded Haiti in 1915, Haiti’s economic policies have been controlled by Washington — more recently by means of the World Bank.
Only foreign capital and a small number of domestic capitalists reap the benefits, while the great majority of Haitians still subsist on less than US$2 a day and live in dangerous and dilapidated houses that cannot withstand the forces of nature.
It is true that the international community has provided Haiti with economic support and financial aid over the decades, but it gives less than it takes.
In 2003, for example, Haiti received US$39 million in educational, medical and social assistance from abroad, but in the same year it had to spend one and a half times that amount — US$57 million — to repay foreign loans and interest.
Haiti’s tragedy is not just one of natural disasters. It is also one of poverty and lack of social resilience.
The best way for the international community to show its humanitarian concern for Haiti would be to help its people escape from absolute poverty and establish a resilient society.
The first step that the international community — including Taiwan — should take is to cancel Haiti’s debt.
Chi Chun-chieh is a professor at the Institute of Ethnic Relations at National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath