Pan-green voters traditionally outnumber pan-blue voters in coastal parts of Taoyuan County, so the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) victory there in last Saturday’s legislative by-election marks a return to the normal state of affairs.
Taitung County and Taichung County’s Dali City (大里) and Taiping Township (太平), on the other hand, have traditionally been pan-blue territory, with close ties between candidates and powerful local factions. The Yu (余) family in Taichung is so influential that Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had to go there to pay his respects during his presidential election campaigns.
After the DPP’s Chien Chao-tung (簡肇棟) lost two elections in Taiping Township, there didn’t seem to be much hope for him. Thinking that under the single-member electoral district system that was introduced in 2008 local factions would decide everything, Chien was inclined to quit campaigning. It was only after the DPP won September’s legislative by-election in Yunlin that the party overcame its excessive anxiety about the single-member system.
Last weekend’s results prove what was shown by the Yunlin by-election. Contrary to what most people think, in the single-member district system, the central government’s successes and failures will be more important than local factions’ influence. Unexpectedly, the single-member system turns out to be the very thing that can break local faction control. Halving the number of seats in the Legislative Yuan was strongly advantageous to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in outlying islands and Aboriginal areas because of the small number of votes required to elect members for those traditionally pro-KMT constituencies. This was one of the reasons why the DPP share of legislative seats hit a historic low at the last nationwide election, and it looked as though the party would stay in the minority for a long time. In the future, however, the single-member system may, on the contrary, work in the DPP’s favor.
Just before the Constitution was amended, then-DPP chairman Chen Shui-bian, presiding over his party’s Central Standing Committee (CSC), decided that at least one of four proposed amendments to the legislature must be passed, and the change he wanted was a measure halving the number of seats. Chen ordered that any DPP legislator who acted contrary to this policy would face severe disciplinary action. At the time, I insisted that I would prefer to vote “no” if it was proposed that the number of seats be halved without any complementary measures. Former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) strongly disagreed with my position. Lin, leader of the Nuke-4 Referendum Initiative Association (核四公投促進會), visited the DPP headquarters and called for me to be expelled from the party. After listening to my explanation, however, CSC member Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) took it upon himself to delete the part about passing at least one reform from Chen’s directive, inserting instead the demand that none of the four proposed amendments be omitted.
In theory, a single-member district system enables voters to make sure that their elected representatives carry out their political duties, giving legislators no room to shirk their responsibilities. Multi-party constituencies, on the other hand, preserve the mechanisms by which local factions share power among themselves. This has already been proven by the example of Japan, where a similar change led to the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) losing power despite its very solid local base.
In Japan’s House of Councilors, 121 seats, half of the house, are up for voting at each election. Of these, 73 are elected from constituencies and 48 by proportional representation. Before last year’s election, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) held 64 of these seats, precisely twice the number held by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). Following the poll, however, the LDP were left with just 37 seats, while the DPJ’s number of seats surged to 60.
The LDP has a strong power base at the local level, but it was called to account for its record of corruption. The ratio of votes gained by the DPJ and LDP was 10 to 7, but under a multi-member district system, they would have gained an equal number of seats — 17 each. Under the single-member district system, however, the DPJ got 23 seats compared with 6 for the LDP. Clearly, the DPJ’s big victory is entirely attributable to the single-member system.
In Taiwan’s case, as long as the DPP maintains a better image than its rival, the single-member electoral district system will help it overcome the losses it sustained when the number of seats in the legislature was halved, and there is a chance that the new system could help the DPP gain its first-ever legislative majority.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath