Why protests were justified
The demonstrations in Taichung against the cross-strait talks were extensively covered by media. The coverage in Monday’s lead story (“Nation rallies against Chiang-Chen talks,” Dec. 21, 2009, page 1) shows why the protests were justified.
In the past months, our dignity as Taiwanese has been sabotaged repeatedly by the government’s policies.
First, there is the matter of relaxing restrictions on US beef imports, a direct threat to public health. Next, there is the threat of global warming, yet the government’s emissions reduction policy is unclear, contributing to fact that many Taiwanese are ignorant or indifferent to climate change and the recent climate talks in Copenhagen.
The last straw is a proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
More than 80 percent of Taiwanese are not sure what the ECFA entails, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was quoted as saying in the same article. This shows the ruling party’s poor advocacy of its own policies.
The protests did not just target the cross-strait talks, but had a broader message, as Tsai said: “Taiwanese people are the masters of this land.”
The administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should treat us with dignity. The public deserves to know what purpose policies serve and how they will impact the nation internationally. Many of the protesters in Taichung may not even have known what was to be discussed at the cross-strait talks.
MANDY CHOU
Taipei
Let’s be pragmatic
President Ma believes that an ECFA would improve bilateral trade with China and somehow allow Taiwan to gradually convince China to play fair by letting it join ASEAN Plus Three.
But we must remember that although China accounts for roughly 20 percent of the global population, the rest of the world is still bigger and more important than China. Taiwan should continue expanding into the international community and not put all its eggs in one basket.
MICHAEL TSAI
Tainan
Do your bit to save the world
A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air hit 387 parts per million this year — a record high. That means humans are facing a bigger climate crisis than ever before.
The climate talks held in Copenhagen have drawn wide attention from media around the world. Some 45 national media around the globe ran editorials urging conference participants — especially key stakeholders such as the US, China and the EU — to reach a consensus to cut emissions.
It is the responsibility of every country in the world to take action on climate change, but can policies alone bring us clean air?
Saving the earth is everyone’s responsibility. The IPCC report predicted that the Arctic pack ice will disappear completely by the year 2100. Some people feel this is a problem for people alive 100 years from now, and so they consume without further thought.
A recent news report said some students at national universities are enormously wasteful. They leave their dorm rooms without turning out lights and leave the computer on while they sleep.
These students think energy is an all-you-can-eat buffet because it’s so cheap. But don’t forget, the price of energy isn’t just the bill in the mail, it’s the toll on our world’s future.
Now some students at National Taiwan University are setting a good example. They have organized a group called Green Superman to collect abandoned plastic bags for reuse. In the first three days alone they collected almost 20,000 plastic bags. The students have also set up plastic bag recycling bins in dorms.
The group has drawn public support, with some non-students helping out by bringing bags to the group.
No matter where you’re from, remember, fighting climate change is not just the responsibility of your country’s leaders. Everyone has a role to play.
JESSICA SU
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath