Although no comprehensive deal was reached at climate talks in Copenhagen, countries now recognize global warming as an important issue that must be addressed by humanity as a whole. As Taiwan is susceptible to flooding, droughts and other natural disasters, we cannot ignore the question of whether we are prepared for potential crises caused by climate change.
Months after Typhoon Morakot brought the worst flooding in half a century last summer, southern Taiwan is now facing a water shortage. Last week, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called a meeting to discuss the matter. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has instructed the Ministry of Economic Affairs to formulate a drought response mechanism.
The ministry’s Water Resources Agency proposes to offer a discount on water bills for households that conserve water, with the highest possible discount at 15 percent. At that rate, the average household would only save NT$30 per month. Is that a strong incentive to watch how much water we use?
Statistics show that average water usage per capita on Taiwan proper and in Kaohsiung City is 290 liters per day. The figure for Taipei is 396 liters. This is far above the international average of 250 liters. The reason for this is that water is cheap, which encourages waste.
The ministry’s plan is obviously modeled on the electricity discount. Because of rising electricity prices, the government last year introduced a plan to encourage the public to save energy, offering discounts to anyone using less electricity than during the previous billing period.
This only worked because electricity is much more expensive than water, and now that electricity prices have gone up even further, people are trying to save energy just to save money. But applying the same reasoning to overly cheap water is not likely to work.
Water prices should have been raised long ago, but Taiwan’s frequent elections have discouraged the government from taking a step that could anger voters. But if electricity prices can be raised, the government should be able to substantially raise water prices. Then it can offer a discount substantial enough to function as an incentive to save water.
Pecuniary benefits cannot be the only means to encourage conservation, however. This should be combined with education and other changes. In addition, water conservation plans should not only involve the public, but also industries and agriculture.
In the past, when Taiwan’s food self-sufficiency rate was around 50 percent, the agricultural sector accounted for 70 percent of the nation’s water usage. Today, with a self-sufficiency rate at only 25 percent, agricultural water usage still accounts for 70 percent. It is clear that there is much room for improvement. When it comes to industrial water usage, Taiwan’s low water prices have always been an incentive for the high-tech, electroplating and dyeing industries to set up factories. In particular, lax water recycling rules have resulted in the public subsidizing wasteful consumption by industrial users.
Urbanization and a changing climate mean that Taiwan’s water situation will continue to deteriorate. The government must not only tackle the immediate water shortage, but also launch a comprehensive review of our water resources, industrial structure and wastefulness. Quick fixes to such a complex problem are not realistic.
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS