Although no comprehensive deal was reached at climate talks in Copenhagen, countries now recognize global warming as an important issue that must be addressed by humanity as a whole. As Taiwan is susceptible to flooding, droughts and other natural disasters, we cannot ignore the question of whether we are prepared for potential crises caused by climate change.
Months after Typhoon Morakot brought the worst flooding in half a century last summer, southern Taiwan is now facing a water shortage. Last week, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called a meeting to discuss the matter. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has instructed the Ministry of Economic Affairs to formulate a drought response mechanism.
The ministry’s Water Resources Agency proposes to offer a discount on water bills for households that conserve water, with the highest possible discount at 15 percent. At that rate, the average household would only save NT$30 per month. Is that a strong incentive to watch how much water we use?
Statistics show that average water usage per capita on Taiwan proper and in Kaohsiung City is 290 liters per day. The figure for Taipei is 396 liters. This is far above the international average of 250 liters. The reason for this is that water is cheap, which encourages waste.
The ministry’s plan is obviously modeled on the electricity discount. Because of rising electricity prices, the government last year introduced a plan to encourage the public to save energy, offering discounts to anyone using less electricity than during the previous billing period.
This only worked because electricity is much more expensive than water, and now that electricity prices have gone up even further, people are trying to save energy just to save money. But applying the same reasoning to overly cheap water is not likely to work.
Water prices should have been raised long ago, but Taiwan’s frequent elections have discouraged the government from taking a step that could anger voters. But if electricity prices can be raised, the government should be able to substantially raise water prices. Then it can offer a discount substantial enough to function as an incentive to save water.
Pecuniary benefits cannot be the only means to encourage conservation, however. This should be combined with education and other changes. In addition, water conservation plans should not only involve the public, but also industries and agriculture.
In the past, when Taiwan’s food self-sufficiency rate was around 50 percent, the agricultural sector accounted for 70 percent of the nation’s water usage. Today, with a self-sufficiency rate at only 25 percent, agricultural water usage still accounts for 70 percent. It is clear that there is much room for improvement. When it comes to industrial water usage, Taiwan’s low water prices have always been an incentive for the high-tech, electroplating and dyeing industries to set up factories. In particular, lax water recycling rules have resulted in the public subsidizing wasteful consumption by industrial users.
Urbanization and a changing climate mean that Taiwan’s water situation will continue to deteriorate. The government must not only tackle the immediate water shortage, but also launch a comprehensive review of our water resources, industrial structure and wastefulness. Quick fixes to such a complex problem are not realistic.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the