Vaccination is the best way to protect against influenza. The government, with vaccines sourced from home and abroad, launched an inoculation program on Nov. 1 for those considered at high risk of contracting A(H1N1), or swine flu. It subsequently launched a nationwide immunization program on Dec. 12, hoping to shield the population against the global epidemic.
Despite the government’s all-out campaign, and despite incentives such as cabbage, towels and stationery offered at some locations, the inoculation rate remains short of the targeted 30 percent of the population. Department of Health Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) said the inoculation rate was around 20 percent as of Tuesday.
Clearly, reports of side effects have dissuaded some people from being vaccinated.
While some may attribute their hesitation to the effectiveness of the vaccines produced by Adimmune Corp — the nation’s sole manufacturer of the H1N1 vaccine for humans — the truth of the matter is the government’s perfunctory handling of complaints and reported side effects has fueled public distrust about the locally produced vaccine and decreased confidence in the vaccination program.
After the inoculation program was launched last month, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said it received a few requests for compensation from people who suffered problems after receiving an H1N1 shot. The complaints ranged from mild dizziness and nausea among students to a high school student who became numb on the left side of her body to two stillbirths and deaths among elderly recipients.
The latest alleged vaccine-related problem is the death of a seven-year-old boy on Monday, 32 days after receiving an H1N1 vaccination. The child’s father, a physician, said his son developed a high fever and a skin rash on Dec. 2.
Each time, the CDC’s answer to these reports has been a quick dismissal that any problems or reported side effects had “nothing to do with the new vaccines,” and that frequency of side effects was similar to other nations.
True, mild dizziness and nausea might be common and thus deemed normal for people who are fearful of vaccinations. There is no evidence in some of the cases that would link the symptoms to the vaccines. There is also no question that, given this nation’s level of medical technology and professionalism, Adimmune could not produce vaccines that are safe and effective. The key, though, is whether the company was given ample time to develop, produce and test this vaccine.
When deaths accompany reported side effects, the Department of Health needs to be prudent and take steps to determine the exact cause of the deaths rather than quickly try to delink the complaints from the vaccine. The CDC’s speedy dismissal of each complaint, without offering an in-depth follow-up or careful review, risks suggesting that the CDC is more concerned with defending Adimmune than guarding public health.
The key to allaying concerns about the vaccine is the government’s attitude. Does it have the sense of responsibility to conduct thorough investigations, or does it remain so self-confident that it is willing to ignore political packaging — as it did in August with Typhoon Morakot?
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS