two recent editions of the Taipei Times had articles on how green buildings may save energy and resources (“Greening Asia’s buildings” Nov. 28, page 9, and “Living in a greener Big Apple,” Nov. 29, page 9). However, while the articles reported on some interesting developments and made a good economic argument for efficient buildings, descriptions of new ideas coming from science and engineering were a bit thin on the ground (this being a rather nice pun for a lack of insulation).
As buildings account for about one-third of global energy use, improving their resource and energy performance is critical to achieve sustainability. I teach all my students that we should imitate nature’s solutions to get us out of the environmental mess. For example, nature recycles 100 percent of all materials and uses only solar energy. Imitating that would go a long way toward solving many environmental problems.
Forward-looking architects, designers and engineers have started doing exactly that, and they call it biomimicry — mimicking biological methods and systems to enhance the design of engineering systems and modern technology (a wonderful introduction to this emerging field is Janine Benyus’ book Biomimicry).
Mother Nature has had billions of years to evolve highly optimized and efficient solutions to its own engineering and design difficulties. Hence, nature is teeming with solutions to our environmental problems. Here’s an amazing example: Termites living in the African savanna somehow manage to keep their buildings, called mounds, at a constant temperature while outside temperatures fluctuate wildly. How do they do it?
They constantly open and close a series of heating and cooling vents throughout the mound over the course of the day, and this ingenious system of air current regulation has now been imitated in several modern buildings, reducing energy costs by up to 90 percent (search Internet for “termites Eastgate” and “Portcullis House”).
But so-called bionic buildings go much further: They use intelligent design to reduce the use of materials (think the Eiffel tower and its skeleton-like structure) or to respond smartly to a changing environment (think Taipei 101 and its wind and earthquake damper).
Bionic buildings, like the termite mounds, react to outside heat, cold or wind by changing internal air currents, shading or opening windows, or recycling water continuously through internal gardens that clean the water, stabilize internal temperature and improve air quality (search Internet for “bionic building”).
In the future, truly responsive buildings would gather all residual compressive loads into a single mast and then respond to changes in internal and external forces by adaptively changing their state of prestress, giving extreme lightweight stability (www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/biomimetics/).
Further ideas include making tougher cement with less energy (search Internet for “Roman concrete”) and self-cleaning walls and windows (www.treehugger.com/files/2005/09/sto_lotusan_bio.php).
However, unused building surfaces are actually a wasted resource and should instead be covered either with solar panels or with plants.
So-called green roofs have many benefits: They decrease storm water and urban heat, improve the building’s insulation, water and air quality, and provide habitat for plants and animals and a place for people to relax.
Renowned architect William McDonough even planned to harvest food on the roofs of the planned model village of Huangbaiyu in China, but unfortunately construction seems to have stalled.
Imagine how greening Taipei’s roofs would convert most of the city’s surface from cold, dead concrete to living, breathing plants — what a difference this would make to the quality of life.
New buildings can now be designed to use almost no energy or to even feed energy into the electricity grid.
Naturally, some of these ideas presented here can only be implemented in new buildings, but old buildings can still be retrofitted to make them more energy-efficient, non-toxic and recycling-friendly. Retrofitted buildings are better for the inhabitants, the environment and the resale price.
An excellent report called Energy Saving Measures for Taiwan’s Built Environment details how already available technologies and strategies can improve the energy efficiency of existing and new buildings by at least 30 percent.
Architects, designers and engineers should take note of these developments, and governments should urgently pass building and retrofitting standards and then subsidize their implementation.
People should demand to live in enjoyable houses that will also sustain their children’s future. And given we spend most of our time indoors now, nothing can enhance quality of life more than using nature’s tricks and services to build sustainable houses and cities.
Bruno Walther is a visiting assistant professor of environmental science at the College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS