Across Africa, there are growing concerns, which the three of us share, that the continent is being marginalized in the major debates leading up to the COP15 climate-change summit in Copenhagen this month. While the main focus has been on the impact of climate-change mitigation on industrialized countries, the urgent adaptation needs of the world’s poorest countries, in the face of possible catastrophe, have largely been ignored, at least in terms of concrete measures.
Perhaps the world needs reminding that Africa is the continent that contributes least to climate change, but must now live with its most serious consequences. The signs are already ominous. Weather patterns are changing; the rains, in certain areas, have been failing; and great swaths of the continent have been suffering unusually severe drought.
Africa’s geographical position, sensitive water resources, unsustainable agricultural methods and exploitation by foreign and other private companies increases its vulnerability. Deforestation for timber and energy precipitate erosion and reduce soil fertility. Conflict is increasing as communities compete for scarce resources. Indeed, the conflicts in Darfur, Somalia and the Ivory Coast were partly caused by disputes over agricultural and grazing land.
Africa’s potential can be harnessed only by adaptation to climate change using disaster risk-reduction mechanisms. Moreover, parts of Africa possess massive latent potential for agricultural development, which it is in our collective interest to encourage. If communities can replant rather than deforest, they can create carbon-dioxide sinks, improve the water balance and protect the micro-climate — all of which would favor agriculture, food security and efforts to mitigate global climate change in a sustainable way.
Historically, Europe must shoulder much of the responsibility for Africa’s current state of development. The slave trade, colonialism and the flawed process of colonial divestment all left their mark on Africa’s newly independent and fragile states. Now materialistic Europe and the developed world are imposing another disaster on a struggling Africa through a life style of self-enrichment, consumption and waste.
The African-European Parliamentary Dialogue on Climate Change was launched by AWEPA (the Association of European Parliamentarians for Africa) in cooperation with the Pan-African Parliament and other major parliamentary actors in Nairobi in August last year. During follow-up meetings in Africa and Europe, concrete action plans with a special focus on Africa began to be developed.
Other Parliamentary networks such as GLOBE (Global Legislators Organization), PGA (Parliamentarians for Global Action), and PNOWB (the Parliamentary Network on the World Bank) are also participating. The aim is to put Africa high on the agenda at the Copenhagen summit.
The conclusion of the Dialogue will be presented to the Copenhagen summit this month. The African-European Parliamentary Seminar in Stockholm this August (Sweden is the current EU president) emphasized the need for an implementation strategy to ensure that commitments made at Copenhagen in such areas as the development of climate change-related policies and legislative reform are fulfilled.
Similarly, AWEPA will work with African and European parliamentarians to ensure that international assistance for African adaptation is delivered and carefully monitored. It will also mobilize support for African parliamentarians, enabling them to work with their constituents in raising awareness, at a local level, of new sustainable agricultural policies that respond to changes in weather patterns and other consequences of climate change.
African countries, as parties to global negotiations, have crucial contributions to make to climate politics. But climate-change mitigation and adaptation are costly. European and other high-income countries, including the US, must meet their obligation in accordance with the “polluter pays” principle to provide Africa with new, accessible, dependable and reliable funding to support mitigation and adaptation strategies in areas such as disaster risk reduction, renewable energy, technology and skill development.
The position taken by the EU’s national leaders in October, that developing nations would need 100 billion euros (US$148.5 billion) in help annually by 2020 to cope with climate change, was an important step in the right direction. But those commitments are still vague given the fact that EU leaders failed to say how much of the funding would be coming from Europe. Therefore, the real results of this EU agreement on climate funding remain to be seen.
The time has come for Europe, the US and others to recognize their responsibilities concerning the impact of climate change on Africa. But, as they recognize their responsibilities, they must do so in ways that respect African priorities. This is simple justice.
Graca Machel is president of the AWEPA Partnership Council and founder and president of the Foundation for Community Development in Mozambique. Wangari Maathai, president of the Green Belt Movement, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004. Mary Robinson, a former president of Ireland, is president of Realizing Rights: The Ethical Globalization Initiative.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
RSS