After signing the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with Beijing, Taiwan will have to open most of its service sector businesses to China within a limited period of time.
The production value of Taiwan’s service sector exceeds 70 percent of the nation’s total economic output, and service sector employees make up 60 percent of the total work force. Within the service sector, commercial services — including the retail, wholesale and hospitality industries — account for 20 percent of the nation’s total output. With 2.5 million employees — 25 percent of Taiwan’s work force — it is the sector with the biggest work force.
The government plans to open the nation’s retail, wholesale and hospitality industries to Chinese investment in line with the treatment given to other WTO member states. Once an ECFA is signed, Chinese businesspeople will be able to invest and run businesses in these industries. Chinese will also be allowed to open shops in the nation’s urban and rural areas, on big roads and back streets.
Taiwan and China share a common language. In overpopulated China, many people hope to make money in Taiwan. Chinese enterprises and self-employed entrepreneurs lack legal and ethical understanding and use illegal means to beat the competition. They have the backing of their authoritarian country, which claims that Taiwan is part of its territory. This will make it difficult for Taiwanese retailers to survive, meaning they may in the end be taken over.
Based on the treatment given to other WTO member states, Taiwan will have to grant residence and work permits to Chinese retail managers. The initial visa is valid for three years, which is then renewable on a one year basis indefinitely. This would cause two problems.
First, if a Chinese enterprise or individual entrepreneur opens a store in Taiwan, a Chinese manager will be sent to head the store. A small shop, however, would only have three or four workers, including the manager. That means one local worker would lose his job if a Chinese store replaces a Taiwanese one.
In light of the large number of small businesses here, the unemployment rate will surge once Taiwan opens its retail, wholesale and hospitality industries to Chinese investment. Chinese enterprises bend the rules by labeling the large number of Chinese workers it hires as managers, consultants or experts. Chinese firms hiring illegal Chinese workers for Chinese projects overseas is a good example. Can the Taiwanese government and administrative system stop this?
Second, because of the unclear “one China” situation, it will be difficult to deny Republic of China (ROC) citizenship and identity cards to Chinese workers once they have resided in Taiwan for a certain period of time. This will lead to political and social problems, with new immigrants replacing local residents. It could even lead to ethnic conflicts like the confrontation between Hans and Uighurs in Urumqi, China.
Retailers and businesses in the hospitality industry, from big hotels to tiny breakfast shops, provide a key employment channel. Unfortunately, the government has failed to state the negative impact an ECFA will have on this employment channel, and it will not allow a referendum or allow open debate.
One of the solutions for the Taiwanese to save themselves is to not vote for candidates supported by Ma in the local government elections tomorrow. Otherwise, he may think the public supports an ECFA.
Lin Kien-tsu is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS