Yesterday and today, heads of state and government of 23 APEC members, including US President Barack Obama, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, are attending the annual summit in Singapore. Because of Beijing’s objections, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — like his predecessors Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — has been excluded from the forum.
Last year, Ma dispatched Lien Chan (連戰), a former vice president and premier, as his representative to the APEC summit meeting in Peru. This time, Ma has again sent Lien.
Lien is the most senior former Taiwan official to participate in an APEC summit. In 2001, Chen named former vice president Li Yuan-zu (李元簇) as his envoy at the APEC summit in Shanghai, but the Chinese government, in contravention of APEC rules and precedents, refused to admit him.
Thereafter, Taiwan sent people like Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) and Morris Chang (張忠謀), chairman of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.
When Ma came to office in May last year, he had hoped to attend the Peru APEC summit. He had, after all, implemented a policy of opening to and reconciliation with China and had done everything possible to improve relations and develop a friendship with Beijing. Hadn’t Hu said that China wanted to help Taiwan expand its international participation? There was no reason, therefore, for Beijing to object to Ma’s presence — or so he thought.
To Ma’s disappointment, Beijing vetoed him. When former US president Bill Clinton, the host of the first APEC summit in Seattle in 1993, yielded to Beijing’s pressure not to invite Lee Teng-hui to the summit, he set a bad precedent, allowing China to wield de facto veto power over Taiwan’s representation ever since.
Thus, like his two most recent predecessors, Ma was compelled to appoint an envoy. His first choice was Fredrick Chien (錢復), minister of foreign affairs and a former National Assembly speaker and Control Yuan president. To Ma’s chagrin, Beijing vetoed him as well and, political sources say, had a say in naming its preferred candidate — Lien. Ma had to swallow this “bitter pill” because it would be politically impossible to oppose him.
Is there a particular reason for Beijing to support Lien? Yes. In April 2005, Hu invited Lien, then-chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its unsuccessful presidential candidate in 2000 and 2004, to visit China and set up a KMT-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forum, a platform that calls for “one China” and opposes Taiwanese independence. The platform has provided Lien, the KMT’s “honorary chairman” since July 2005 and leader of the KMT’s pro-Beijing faction (or “old guard”), with opportunities to fraternize with Hu in China and set the tone for cross-strait rapprochement.
Hu has thus skillfully implemented a united front strategy to manipulate the KMT and Taiwan’s young democracy. Even after Ma took over as president, Beijing’s gambit to use Lien to checkmate Ma and to advance its Taiwan agenda has continued.
Lien yesterday met with Hu, and the economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) was a key topic for discussion. Lien had told reporters that informal talks on an ECFA had taken place and that because senior officials from both sides of the Strait would be in Singapore, “it is a prime opportunity to conclude the informal phase of the talks to expedite the official phase of the negotiation process.”
Parris Chang is professor emeritus of political science at Pennsylvania State University and president of the Taiwan Institute for Political Economic and Strategic Studies. He is a former National Security Council deputy secretary-general and a former chairman of the legislative defense and foreign relations committees.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS