Constitutional Interpretation No. 666 by the Council of Grand Justices has declared unconstitutional the first clause of Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), under which sex workers, but not their customers, are fined. The council also declared that the clause would be voided in two years’ time.
We heartily agree with this decision. Following a campaign by Taipei’s licensed prostitutes in 1997, countless grassroots sex workers have sacrificed their lives, blood and tears. Thanks to the hard work of prostitution rights activists and supporting organizations, the call for decriminalizing the industry is finally gaining wider public support.
Even the few organizations that used to oppose the effort now agree that prostitutes should not be penalized. This shows that people have gradually freed themselves from moralistic and restrictive prejudices about sex. The latest ruling is a new milestone on this path, and it sets a positive example for Asia and for ethnic Chinese everywhere.
In our view, neither sex workers nor consumers should be punished for involvement in consensual sex transactions. However, where the business of sex affects the public interest, such as problems with public health, location of sex transactions, labor protection and prevention of associated criminal activity, the state should take appropriate measures to deal with these problems.
We suggest that the Cabinet and the legislature catch up with this gradually forming social consensus by recognizing that neither prostitutes nor their clients should be penalized.
They should then draft a law on the management of sex transactions between adults, along with complementary measures, and scrap Article 80 of the Act. A statement by the Ministry of the Interior in June that sex transactions conducted outside specified zones would continue to be regulated by the Act indicates that the direction of legislative amendment remains unclear.
Besides, as the grand justices stated: “No matter what policies political bodies choose to control sexual transactions in the future, they must bear in mind that the present interpretation has been made in consideration of the hardship suffered by grassroots sex workers compelled by a combination of many kinds of disadvantage.”
The ministry once promised to listen to sex workers in the process of amending the law, but it has not invited a single sex worker to take part in the policy formulation process.
As “Meizi,” a sex worker active on the streets, said: “Academics have never done sex work themselves, so how can they know what kind of arrangement is suitable for our needs?”
On the question of where sex-related businesses should be located, there should be appropriate restrictions that reflect local circumstances. Such areas could be delimited positively or negatively, and designating zones for sex transactions could be an option.
However, we cannot see how the draft proposed by the ministry in June would provide a guarantee of employment for middle-aged, elderly and underprivileged sex workers. The government should give such sex workers a chance to survive in a self-employed, self-managed capacity. At the same time, the authorities should actively propose better welfare and employment policies for grassroots sex workers so that those lacking resources have a wider variety of options.
Finally, as legal amendments are discussed over the two-year transitional period, we ask that city mayors and county commissioners implement the National Police Agency’s directive that police officers not receive merits for arresting sex workers. Local officials should not follow the example of Kaohsiung, Taipei and Taichung, which, when hosting the World Games, Deaflympics and National Games, harassed street vendors and sex workers because they wanted to give their cities a facelift.
We hope law enforcement agencies investigating sex work-related cases will take up a suggestion by Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Hsieh Wen-ting (謝文定) and respect the spirit of compassion and tolerance embodied elsewhere in the Social Order Maintenance Act by imposing light penalties — or no penalty at all.
Chung Chun-chu and Chang Jung-che are, respectively, the chief executive officer and policy director of the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (COSWAS).
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS