Constitutional Interpretation No. 666 by the Council of Grand Justices has declared unconstitutional the first clause of Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), under which sex workers, but not their customers, are fined. The council also declared that the clause would be voided in two years’ time.
We heartily agree with this decision. Following a campaign by Taipei’s licensed prostitutes in 1997, countless grassroots sex workers have sacrificed their lives, blood and tears. Thanks to the hard work of prostitution rights activists and supporting organizations, the call for decriminalizing the industry is finally gaining wider public support.
Even the few organizations that used to oppose the effort now agree that prostitutes should not be penalized. This shows that people have gradually freed themselves from moralistic and restrictive prejudices about sex. The latest ruling is a new milestone on this path, and it sets a positive example for Asia and for ethnic Chinese everywhere.
In our view, neither sex workers nor consumers should be punished for involvement in consensual sex transactions. However, where the business of sex affects the public interest, such as problems with public health, location of sex transactions, labor protection and prevention of associated criminal activity, the state should take appropriate measures to deal with these problems.
We suggest that the Cabinet and the legislature catch up with this gradually forming social consensus by recognizing that neither prostitutes nor their clients should be penalized.
They should then draft a law on the management of sex transactions between adults, along with complementary measures, and scrap Article 80 of the Act. A statement by the Ministry of the Interior in June that sex transactions conducted outside specified zones would continue to be regulated by the Act indicates that the direction of legislative amendment remains unclear.
Besides, as the grand justices stated: “No matter what policies political bodies choose to control sexual transactions in the future, they must bear in mind that the present interpretation has been made in consideration of the hardship suffered by grassroots sex workers compelled by a combination of many kinds of disadvantage.”
The ministry once promised to listen to sex workers in the process of amending the law, but it has not invited a single sex worker to take part in the policy formulation process.
As “Meizi,” a sex worker active on the streets, said: “Academics have never done sex work themselves, so how can they know what kind of arrangement is suitable for our needs?”
On the question of where sex-related businesses should be located, there should be appropriate restrictions that reflect local circumstances. Such areas could be delimited positively or negatively, and designating zones for sex transactions could be an option.
However, we cannot see how the draft proposed by the ministry in June would provide a guarantee of employment for middle-aged, elderly and underprivileged sex workers. The government should give such sex workers a chance to survive in a self-employed, self-managed capacity. At the same time, the authorities should actively propose better welfare and employment policies for grassroots sex workers so that those lacking resources have a wider variety of options.
Finally, as legal amendments are discussed over the two-year transitional period, we ask that city mayors and county commissioners implement the National Police Agency’s directive that police officers not receive merits for arresting sex workers. Local officials should not follow the example of Kaohsiung, Taipei and Taichung, which, when hosting the World Games, Deaflympics and National Games, harassed street vendors and sex workers because they wanted to give their cities a facelift.
We hope law enforcement agencies investigating sex work-related cases will take up a suggestion by Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Hsieh Wen-ting (謝文定) and respect the spirit of compassion and tolerance embodied elsewhere in the Social Order Maintenance Act by imposing light penalties — or no penalty at all.
Chung Chun-chu and Chang Jung-che are, respectively, the chief executive officer and policy director of the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (COSWAS).
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS