Constitutional Interpretation No. 666 by the Council of Grand Justices has declared unconstitutional the first clause of Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), under which sex workers, but not their customers, are fined. The council also declared that the clause would be voided in two years’ time.
We heartily agree with this decision. Following a campaign by Taipei’s licensed prostitutes in 1997, countless grassroots sex workers have sacrificed their lives, blood and tears. Thanks to the hard work of prostitution rights activists and supporting organizations, the call for decriminalizing the industry is finally gaining wider public support.
Even the few organizations that used to oppose the effort now agree that prostitutes should not be penalized. This shows that people have gradually freed themselves from moralistic and restrictive prejudices about sex. The latest ruling is a new milestone on this path, and it sets a positive example for Asia and for ethnic Chinese everywhere.
In our view, neither sex workers nor consumers should be punished for involvement in consensual sex transactions. However, where the business of sex affects the public interest, such as problems with public health, location of sex transactions, labor protection and prevention of associated criminal activity, the state should take appropriate measures to deal with these problems.
We suggest that the Cabinet and the legislature catch up with this gradually forming social consensus by recognizing that neither prostitutes nor their clients should be penalized.
They should then draft a law on the management of sex transactions between adults, along with complementary measures, and scrap Article 80 of the Act. A statement by the Ministry of the Interior in June that sex transactions conducted outside specified zones would continue to be regulated by the Act indicates that the direction of legislative amendment remains unclear.
Besides, as the grand justices stated: “No matter what policies political bodies choose to control sexual transactions in the future, they must bear in mind that the present interpretation has been made in consideration of the hardship suffered by grassroots sex workers compelled by a combination of many kinds of disadvantage.”
The ministry once promised to listen to sex workers in the process of amending the law, but it has not invited a single sex worker to take part in the policy formulation process.
As “Meizi,” a sex worker active on the streets, said: “Academics have never done sex work themselves, so how can they know what kind of arrangement is suitable for our needs?”
On the question of where sex-related businesses should be located, there should be appropriate restrictions that reflect local circumstances. Such areas could be delimited positively or negatively, and designating zones for sex transactions could be an option.
However, we cannot see how the draft proposed by the ministry in June would provide a guarantee of employment for middle-aged, elderly and underprivileged sex workers. The government should give such sex workers a chance to survive in a self-employed, self-managed capacity. At the same time, the authorities should actively propose better welfare and employment policies for grassroots sex workers so that those lacking resources have a wider variety of options.
Finally, as legal amendments are discussed over the two-year transitional period, we ask that city mayors and county commissioners implement the National Police Agency’s directive that police officers not receive merits for arresting sex workers. Local officials should not follow the example of Kaohsiung, Taipei and Taichung, which, when hosting the World Games, Deaflympics and National Games, harassed street vendors and sex workers because they wanted to give their cities a facelift.
We hope law enforcement agencies investigating sex work-related cases will take up a suggestion by Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Hsieh Wen-ting (謝文定) and respect the spirit of compassion and tolerance embodied elsewhere in the Social Order Maintenance Act by imposing light penalties — or no penalty at all.
Chung Chun-chu and Chang Jung-che are, respectively, the chief executive officer and policy director of the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (COSWAS).
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
RSS