Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) is a woman with enemies. That is clear regardless of whether one believes her claims that she has received threats from anonymous individuals for criticizing her own party.
The most recent manifestation of this was a proposal submitted to her party’s Central Advisory Council on Sunday that unmistakeably targeted her. The proposal called for “unsuitable” legislators-at-large to resign or face scrutiny by the KMT’s Disciplinary Committee.
It is not clear what, if anything, will come of this proposal. It may be meant as a warning to Lo, who has made enemies within the KMT because of her very public criticism of some of her party’s policies and the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Lo’s sharp tongue makes her a more credible voice than other KMT figures. Unlike most criticism within the party, Lo’s positions present themselves as more issue-based and less a matter of internal rivalry and manipulation.
In one of her more remarkable assessments of late, Lo said the Control Yuan should take action against Ma if he had broken the law while mayor of Taipei. Lo was referring to Ma’s permitting the construction of a 23-story building close to the presidential residence despite potential security risks. (That remark, however, did highlight a poor understanding of the law on Lo’s part, as the Control Yuan cannot censure the president.)
Earlier this month, Lo also said that costly, portable satellite equipment that should be used during typhoon season had not been deployed this summer because of a lack of trained operators. That compelled Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) to rebut the claims, which had hit a sore spot after outrage over the mishandling of Morakot relief efforts forced a Cabinet reshuffle.
The proposal targeting Lo submitted on Sunday followed a signature drive launched by KMT youth delegates calling on her to resign over her open criticism of the government. The delegates said Lo should not go public with opinions that make the Ma administration or the party look bad. The message is, essentially: Fight behind closed doors and present a united front to the public.
But these delegates are overlooking the value of public debate, which could put pressure on the administration to answer criticism it could otherwise ignore. Lo’s arguments may also appeal to voters unhappy with the policies of the Ma administration but not opposed to the party on all matters. Considering the consistently low public support ratings for this administration, the KMT stands to benefit from showing a plurality of opinion.
As members aspiring to join the next generation of KMT leadership, the attitude of these youth delegates is discouraging. They do not indicate a growing appreciation for open debate within the KMT’s younger ranks, and that is cause for concern.
“Is the party going to control freedom of speech?” Lo asked on Sunday.
In the case of a critical voice like Lo’s, it may want to. But the KMT should also be aware that shooting down critics within the party will project not an image of unity, but of intolerance. That would strengthen the concerns of the KMT’s critics outside the party, who warn that its professed support for democracy is a charade.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS