For obvious reasons, all eyes have been on the Control Yuan’s review of the government’s response to Typhoon Morakot. Soon after the typhoon hit Taiwan and the devastation in the south became apparent, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) reacted to the government’s incompetent response with the classic line: “I was so angry that I wanted to scold and kill people, but I didn’t know who to blame.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did, however. His first public criticism was directed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB). Someone or something had to be immediately accountable, and the easiest target was a bunch of civil-service meteorologists with no opportunity to defend their organization or their individual professionalism.
Wang, meanwhile, was able to compose himself and be more specific: “The Control Yuan will impeach the heads of government institutions who failed to improve the problems highlighted by the Control Yuan’s corrective measures.”
And this: “The Control Yuan is entitled to impeach heads of government agencies repeatedly until they step down, and to keep impeaching their successors until problems are resolved.”
Fine words, but judging from the Control Yuan report on the CWB’s handling of Morakot this week, it is not certain that those who acted negligently or incompetently will be identified. Worse, it is possible that scapegoating will be an acceptable substitute.
Try as it might, the Control Yuan report made no meaningful comment on professional aspects of weather forecasting — in particular, how to determine the volume of rainfall likely to hit specific locations that might lead to fatalities. The CWB cannot be held to account for natural phenomena for which no scientific technique offers reliable predictive assistance. Besides, the CWB is made up of meteorologists, not geologists — and certainly not soothsayers.
The Control Yuan’s corrective measures in some cases were laughable, including the quaint idea of a drain-cleaning reminder service for those who need such advice. Clearly, its investigators must adopt a more intelligent approach.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Control Yuan member Cheng Jen-hung (程仁宏) actually offered praise to CWB staff for their meteorological aptitude, but said they have poor public relations skills.
Cheng, who rode into the Control Yuan on the back of his leadership of the Consumers’ Foundation — a media-savvy organization that conducts unscientific “surveys” of consumer products and issues doom-ridden press releases — has, for one, carried over his hobby-horse approach to government accountability by focusing on insubstantial matters. No one should be surprised by this; Cheng, after all, once warned that the High Speed Rail was at risk of derailing, but we still don’t know why.
If an official culture of excessive blame and activist meddling continues, what public confidence that remains in the Control Yuan will sour and political influence could act as the casting vote where profitable.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) may have detected the danger in this, not to mention the gross injustice. On Thursday last week, he made special mention of Daniel Wu (吳德榮), a senior forecaster and head of the CWB’s forecast center who retired early after its pitiful treatment at the hands of the president.
The premier said: “Launching attacks on civil servants who are faithful to their duties and perform well, sapping their morale, will negatively influence the growth of society and impede the nation’s progress. Civil servants should be appraised justly.”
Hear, hear. If only the Control Yuan, and the president, understood why.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had