For obvious reasons, all eyes have been on the Control Yuan’s review of the government’s response to Typhoon Morakot. Soon after the typhoon hit Taiwan and the devastation in the south became apparent, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) reacted to the government’s incompetent response with the classic line: “I was so angry that I wanted to scold and kill people, but I didn’t know who to blame.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did, however. His first public criticism was directed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB). Someone or something had to be immediately accountable, and the easiest target was a bunch of civil-service meteorologists with no opportunity to defend their organization or their individual professionalism.
Wang, meanwhile, was able to compose himself and be more specific: “The Control Yuan will impeach the heads of government institutions who failed to improve the problems highlighted by the Control Yuan’s corrective measures.”
And this: “The Control Yuan is entitled to impeach heads of government agencies repeatedly until they step down, and to keep impeaching their successors until problems are resolved.”
Fine words, but judging from the Control Yuan report on the CWB’s handling of Morakot this week, it is not certain that those who acted negligently or incompetently will be identified. Worse, it is possible that scapegoating will be an acceptable substitute.
Try as it might, the Control Yuan report made no meaningful comment on professional aspects of weather forecasting — in particular, how to determine the volume of rainfall likely to hit specific locations that might lead to fatalities. The CWB cannot be held to account for natural phenomena for which no scientific technique offers reliable predictive assistance. Besides, the CWB is made up of meteorologists, not geologists — and certainly not soothsayers.
The Control Yuan’s corrective measures in some cases were laughable, including the quaint idea of a drain-cleaning reminder service for those who need such advice. Clearly, its investigators must adopt a more intelligent approach.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Control Yuan member Cheng Jen-hung (程仁宏) actually offered praise to CWB staff for their meteorological aptitude, but said they have poor public relations skills.
Cheng, who rode into the Control Yuan on the back of his leadership of the Consumers’ Foundation — a media-savvy organization that conducts unscientific “surveys” of consumer products and issues doom-ridden press releases — has, for one, carried over his hobby-horse approach to government accountability by focusing on insubstantial matters. No one should be surprised by this; Cheng, after all, once warned that the High Speed Rail was at risk of derailing, but we still don’t know why.
If an official culture of excessive blame and activist meddling continues, what public confidence that remains in the Control Yuan will sour and political influence could act as the casting vote where profitable.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) may have detected the danger in this, not to mention the gross injustice. On Thursday last week, he made special mention of Daniel Wu (吳德榮), a senior forecaster and head of the CWB’s forecast center who retired early after its pitiful treatment at the hands of the president.
The premier said: “Launching attacks on civil servants who are faithful to their duties and perform well, sapping their morale, will negatively influence the growth of society and impede the nation’s progress. Civil servants should be appraised justly.”
Hear, hear. If only the Control Yuan, and the president, understood why.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers