A laughable verdict
Any reader with some sense likely finds himself or herself unable to suppress the urge to laugh while perusing the transcript of Judge Tsai Shou-hsun’s (蔡守訓) verdicts on former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his associates with respect to the charges of graft.
Its language is asinine and bombastic, its legal references to Song Dynasty imperial maxims are anachronistic and its tone is at once paltry and narcissistic. Honestly, Judge Tsai, pray enlighten us as to what an emperor of the past Chinese dynasty said in any way has got to do with the heart of the matter of the case.
We would also like to know if attending National Taiwan University merits a harsher penalty for two of the defendants.
We have been given to understand that the transcript will be translated into English and French and then given to the Swiss authorities as a legal basis to claim Chen’s frozen assets in Swiss financial institutions. We shudder to think of the giggling that the transcript may induce when the appropriate Swiss authorities read it. The chance of recovering Chen’s assets will be even less likely as a result.
Much energy and revenue have been wasted on a masterpiece of legal trash. Its legality was pronounced dead the moment President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration helped Tsai hijack the case — a miscalculated measure that many in the pan-blue camp are sorely repenting at this moment.
This has certainly deferred Ma’s goal of putting Chen through a “horrible death.” But Ma is tenacious and good at improvisation. His hangers-on and jackals will continue to provide service to help him achieve his objective. Tsai is just one of the expedients in the grand scheme of this political fiasco.
YANG CHUNHUI
Salt Lake City, Utah
Monitor Internet security
Using the Internet to buy books or getting an online membership to read articles is very common in Taiwan. A report published by Taiwan Network Information Center said the nation’s Internet penetration rate reached 68.94 percent last year. We can expect that more people went online this year.
When we use Internet for online auctions, to join airline frequent flier clubs or read articles, we have to register to become a member first. However, this simple action could lead to trouble.
The average person might sign up on one or two Web sites a month without thinking much about the Web site’s security. To sign up we usually have to provide personal details such as name, birth date, e-mail address and phone number and then provide a user ID and password settings. The Web site registration process is as simple, but this simplicity does not guarantee the information we provide is safe and will not be manipulated by malicious technicians or hackers.
Suppose I Google an interesting article and link to the URL, the Web site requires me to sign up to read the entire article. Usually, we will follow the steps the Web site requests in order to read the intriguing content. The problem is, how many sets of password and user IDs can we actually remember? I am afraid that the answer for most of us is “few.” We seldom memorize different passwords and user IDs for different uses. Many online surfers use the same password they used for their ATM cards or online bank accounts.
Once in a blue moon, I receive e-mails from high school buddies or cyberpals. Suddenly it seems that they have become perverts, sending me lots of pornography links or they change their career to be a pimp by inviting me to visit their business. These poor friends, they still have no idea what’s going on. They have become victims of Internet fraud. Then there are the hackers who use your best friend’s e-mail account to ask you to transfer a couple thousand dollars to help with some emergency.
If we remain unaware or ignore how serious Internet crime is, we might become the next target for those scammers. The best way to prevent this is to update our password every 72 days and separate two sets of password for use on insignificant and important Web sites respectively.
The police should also do more to prevent Internet crime. Legislators should pass laws to catch up with the fast-changing online world. If Internet users take precautions and with help from our government, I believe that we can have a safer Web environment in the near future.
JACK HUANG
Lugang, Changhua County
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS