A laughable verdict
Any reader with some sense likely finds himself or herself unable to suppress the urge to laugh while perusing the transcript of Judge Tsai Shou-hsun’s (蔡守訓) verdicts on former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his associates with respect to the charges of graft.
Its language is asinine and bombastic, its legal references to Song Dynasty imperial maxims are anachronistic and its tone is at once paltry and narcissistic. Honestly, Judge Tsai, pray enlighten us as to what an emperor of the past Chinese dynasty said in any way has got to do with the heart of the matter of the case.
We would also like to know if attending National Taiwan University merits a harsher penalty for two of the defendants.
We have been given to understand that the transcript will be translated into English and French and then given to the Swiss authorities as a legal basis to claim Chen’s frozen assets in Swiss financial institutions. We shudder to think of the giggling that the transcript may induce when the appropriate Swiss authorities read it. The chance of recovering Chen’s assets will be even less likely as a result.
Much energy and revenue have been wasted on a masterpiece of legal trash. Its legality was pronounced dead the moment President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration helped Tsai hijack the case — a miscalculated measure that many in the pan-blue camp are sorely repenting at this moment.
This has certainly deferred Ma’s goal of putting Chen through a “horrible death.” But Ma is tenacious and good at improvisation. His hangers-on and jackals will continue to provide service to help him achieve his objective. Tsai is just one of the expedients in the grand scheme of this political fiasco.
YANG CHUNHUI
Salt Lake City, Utah
Monitor Internet security
Using the Internet to buy books or getting an online membership to read articles is very common in Taiwan. A report published by Taiwan Network Information Center said the nation’s Internet penetration rate reached 68.94 percent last year. We can expect that more people went online this year.
When we use Internet for online auctions, to join airline frequent flier clubs or read articles, we have to register to become a member first. However, this simple action could lead to trouble.
The average person might sign up on one or two Web sites a month without thinking much about the Web site’s security. To sign up we usually have to provide personal details such as name, birth date, e-mail address and phone number and then provide a user ID and password settings. The Web site registration process is as simple, but this simplicity does not guarantee the information we provide is safe and will not be manipulated by malicious technicians or hackers.
Suppose I Google an interesting article and link to the URL, the Web site requires me to sign up to read the entire article. Usually, we will follow the steps the Web site requests in order to read the intriguing content. The problem is, how many sets of password and user IDs can we actually remember? I am afraid that the answer for most of us is “few.” We seldom memorize different passwords and user IDs for different uses. Many online surfers use the same password they used for their ATM cards or online bank accounts.
Once in a blue moon, I receive e-mails from high school buddies or cyberpals. Suddenly it seems that they have become perverts, sending me lots of pornography links or they change their career to be a pimp by inviting me to visit their business. These poor friends, they still have no idea what’s going on. They have become victims of Internet fraud. Then there are the hackers who use your best friend’s e-mail account to ask you to transfer a couple thousand dollars to help with some emergency.
If we remain unaware or ignore how serious Internet crime is, we might become the next target for those scammers. The best way to prevent this is to update our password every 72 days and separate two sets of password for use on insignificant and important Web sites respectively.
The police should also do more to prevent Internet crime. Legislators should pass laws to catch up with the fast-changing online world. If Internet users take precautions and with help from our government, I believe that we can have a safer Web environment in the near future.
JACK HUANG
Lugang, Changhua County
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS