Conspiracy theory limbo
Dear Johnny,
I’ve been pondering some questions unrelated to Morakot and hope you’ll be able to enlighten your eager fans:
1. Is there some connection between your namesake MRT line and the frequent breakdowns on it?
Could it be that the government is Out To Get You and everyone else living in the district?
2. Whatever happened to Cathy Pacific?
Did the two of you break up?
Surely your devoted readers should be able to vote on this — Taiwan is still a democracy, isn’t it?
PROF. JUNE TEUFEL DREYER
Department of
Political Science,
University of Miami
Johnny replies: I admit to a weakness for conspiracy theories, but in this case, alas, it would make no temporal sense. All of the mechanical and logistical problems with the Neihu Line existed long before I embarked on my current career as Mocksmith Emeritus.
What you may see, however, is my neighbors Out To Get The Mayor before it’s all over.
As for my gal Cathy, she remains in existential limbo in Taitung. We are still together, however. Lately she’s had the tape measure out in the disaster zone to see just how wide the riverbeds have become. Still, votes are welcome if readers think this will bring her back.
The mud’s on their hands
Dear Johnny,
What’s with the conspicuous absence of mud flyin’ through the air? I would’ve expected at least a peep or two from the Democratic Progressive Party on the handling of Typhoon Morakot.
They’ve been pretty quiet about the whole thing, even when foreign and domestic media had Mr Ma on the ropes.
They gonna start using this to their advantage at one point, ya think?
TREVOR JOHNSTON
Johnny replies: Well, Trevor, since I received your e-mail, the party has pulled off one of its smartest moves in years: staying reasonably quiet while grassroots officials with party links invited the Dalai Lama.
In the meantime, hacks from party central have been getting their hands dirty down south, talking to victims and helping with the clean-up. It’s called “getting closer to the people” and, Matsu save us, may augur a new respect for connectedness and feedback in the party.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath