A gathering of Asian and US diplomats, economists and academics in Honolulu, Hawaii, came to the surprising conclusion that no Asian nation is willing or able to assume leadership in Asia despite the economic and political progress of recent decades.
The Asian delegates and US “Asia hands” agreed that China is not ready, Japan is not willing and that India is just emerging onto the world stage, while the US is preoccupied with Afghanistan, the Middle East and the economy. Moreover, Asian international organizations such as ASEAN have so far shown themselves to be mostly talk shops.
Most of those in the conference asserted that peace and prosperity in Asia would be best served by a balance of power, especially between China and the US. No one suggested that Beijing and Washington forge a condominium over Asia but all agreed that armed conflict would be disastrous.
This consensus was surprising because a widening view among Asian leaders asserts that power is shifting from West to East.
Kishore Mahbubani, a prominent Singaporean diplomat and scholar, has explored this thesis in a book entitled The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Power to the East.
The Asian and US delegates in Honolulu met in a senior policy seminar at the East-West Center, a research and education organization funded largely by the US Congress. Under the conference rules, speakers and those who took part in the discussion cannot be identified, supposedly to encourage candor.
“China is not oriented toward foreign policy but is obsessed with domestic issues, somewhat like the United States,” an Asian delegate said.
China’s first major venture into international relations — leading the six-party talks among China, South Korea, Japan, Russia, the US and North Korea to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons — has gone nowhere in six years.
Internal dissent in China was underscored by uprisings in Tibet last year and in Xinjiang earlier this year. The worldwide economic crisis has hit China hard and driven the government, always anxious about its hold on power, to adopt a 10-point stimulus program. Abroad, territorial disputes have caused fear of China, especially in Southeast Asia.
Japan, still wrapped in the passive cocoon into which it retreated after the devastating defeat of World War II, is constrained by its divisive politics. In the last three years, Tokyo has seen three prime ministers, four foreign ministers and six defense ministers. The long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is predicted to lose to the untested Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) in the election set for Aug. 30.
“The DPJ is a hodge-podge of old-line Socialists and deserters from the LDP and thus split,” an Asian delegate said. “Its leaders lack experience in government and have failed to cultivate the bureaucrats who really run things in Japan. It will have a rough time governing.”
As a potential leader, India was barely mentioned.
“India is in the equation for the first time,” said an American, lamenting the lack of attention to India.
A US military officer said that relations between Indian and US military forces had expanded.
“India,” he said, “is getting out and about.”
Some Asian and US delegates said that the US was declining in power, with US forces spread thin around the world and the economy troubled at home. Others disagreed.
“Are we seeing the twilight of the US in Asia?” an American asked.
His answer: “No, we are not withdrawing.”
Several speakers contended that the administration of former US president George W. Bush had neglected Asia while the administration of US President Barack Obama was seeking to reverse that perception.
“America has been like Rip Van Winkle, sleeping under a tree,” an American delegate said. “Now he’s awake but we have to see what he actually does.”
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer in Hawaii.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS