Don’t ‘seal’ the truth
I am a proud Canadian, but I am absolutely embarrassed and disgusted by my country’s annual seal slaughter. The EU and millions of people from around the world feel, as do I, that the clubbing of baby harp seals is inhumane and immoral.
In Nina Lex’s recent article (“EU seal ban poses a threat to Newfoundland villages,” Aug. 10, page 9), it is apparent that the author, like our government, supports this massacre.
Why is there no explanation to why the EU banned the hunt? The author tells the story of a poor hunter who will lose a fraction of his annual income because of the ban. Neither the hunter nor the author will get my pity.
“Whether it’s clubbing baby seals, electrocuting minks on fur farms, or crushing foxes’ chests in traps, the bloody fur trade is one of the most hideous industries on Earth,” the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Web site says.
The seal slaughter exists because of the overall demand for fur.
“During Canada’s annual war on seals, sealers routinely hook live seals in the eye, cheek, or mouth to avoid damaging the fur, then they drag the seals across the ice. Many of these gentle creatures may not even have eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim before they are slaughtered for their skin,” the site says.
There have even been numerous testimonials, from veterinarians and officers from the Department of Fisheries, that tell us that many of the seals are actually skinned alive because the hunters don’t properly crush their skulls. It is apparent that it is a cruel industry and I applaud the EU’s decision to ban all seal products. I hope that one day, our own government can follow the moral path of our friends from across the Atlantic and put an end to this blood-stained industry.
It is a shame that the author does not explain why the EU banned this horrific hunt. She does, however, reiterate our government’s idiotic plan to challenge the EU’s decision at the WTO, a move disproportionately expensive when compared with the amount of money the hunt brings in.
Stop the seal hunt!
KYLE BERTRAND
Tainan
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
RSS