Don’t ‘seal’ the truth
I am a proud Canadian, but I am absolutely embarrassed and disgusted by my country’s annual seal slaughter. The EU and millions of people from around the world feel, as do I, that the clubbing of baby harp seals is inhumane and immoral.
In Nina Lex’s recent article (“EU seal ban poses a threat to Newfoundland villages,” Aug. 10, page 9), it is apparent that the author, like our government, supports this massacre.
Why is there no explanation to why the EU banned the hunt? The author tells the story of a poor hunter who will lose a fraction of his annual income because of the ban. Neither the hunter nor the author will get my pity.
“Whether it’s clubbing baby seals, electrocuting minks on fur farms, or crushing foxes’ chests in traps, the bloody fur trade is one of the most hideous industries on Earth,” the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Web site says.
The seal slaughter exists because of the overall demand for fur.
“During Canada’s annual war on seals, sealers routinely hook live seals in the eye, cheek, or mouth to avoid damaging the fur, then they drag the seals across the ice. Many of these gentle creatures may not even have eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim before they are slaughtered for their skin,” the site says.
There have even been numerous testimonials, from veterinarians and officers from the Department of Fisheries, that tell us that many of the seals are actually skinned alive because the hunters don’t properly crush their skulls. It is apparent that it is a cruel industry and I applaud the EU’s decision to ban all seal products. I hope that one day, our own government can follow the moral path of our friends from across the Atlantic and put an end to this blood-stained industry.
It is a shame that the author does not explain why the EU banned this horrific hunt. She does, however, reiterate our government’s idiotic plan to challenge the EU’s decision at the WTO, a move disproportionately expensive when compared with the amount of money the hunt brings in.
Stop the seal hunt!
KYLE BERTRAND
Tainan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath