Don’t ‘seal’ the truth
I am a proud Canadian, but I am absolutely embarrassed and disgusted by my country’s annual seal slaughter. The EU and millions of people from around the world feel, as do I, that the clubbing of baby harp seals is inhumane and immoral.
In Nina Lex’s recent article (“EU seal ban poses a threat to Newfoundland villages,” Aug. 10, page 9), it is apparent that the author, like our government, supports this massacre.
Why is there no explanation to why the EU banned the hunt? The author tells the story of a poor hunter who will lose a fraction of his annual income because of the ban. Neither the hunter nor the author will get my pity.
“Whether it’s clubbing baby seals, electrocuting minks on fur farms, or crushing foxes’ chests in traps, the bloody fur trade is one of the most hideous industries on Earth,” the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Web site says.
The seal slaughter exists because of the overall demand for fur.
“During Canada’s annual war on seals, sealers routinely hook live seals in the eye, cheek, or mouth to avoid damaging the fur, then they drag the seals across the ice. Many of these gentle creatures may not even have eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim before they are slaughtered for their skin,” the site says.
There have even been numerous testimonials, from veterinarians and officers from the Department of Fisheries, that tell us that many of the seals are actually skinned alive because the hunters don’t properly crush their skulls. It is apparent that it is a cruel industry and I applaud the EU’s decision to ban all seal products. I hope that one day, our own government can follow the moral path of our friends from across the Atlantic and put an end to this blood-stained industry.
It is a shame that the author does not explain why the EU banned this horrific hunt. She does, however, reiterate our government’s idiotic plan to challenge the EU’s decision at the WTO, a move disproportionately expensive when compared with the amount of money the hunt brings in.
Stop the seal hunt!
KYLE BERTRAND
Tainan
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS