The Judicial Yuan has finally submitted its long-awaited draft law on reasonable timing for criminal cases to the legislature. Statistics show that Taiwan’s courts handle more than 500,000 cases a year, proof that most judges are far from lazy. However, this is not most people’s conception. The public often asks why higher courts overturn the verdicts in so many financial and murder cases, sending the cases back for retrial. Is justice still justice if it takes so long?
Complicated cases are often the focus of news reports and are one of the main reasons why people criticize the judiciary.
There are three kinds of unresolved cases. The first involves economic and financial crimes. The second involves cases of corruption, influence peddling and irregularities in government purchasing. The third involves murder cases, which are of most concern to the public.
There are many reasons why such cases drag on for such a long time, but generally it boils down to the following: complicated circumstances, difficulty in finding evidence, unreasonable judicial procedure and a shortage of manpower.
The Judical Yuan’s draft attempts to tackle the problem, starting with the litigation system. The draft states that if the courts consider it appropriate, they may reject appeals in cases where a final verdict has not been obtained for more than 10 or 12 years from the start of the first trial, or where the legal and factual aspects are so complex that the process has stalemated, or where key witnesses and evidence cannot be found.
As for manpower shortages, over the past few years the Judicial Yuan has made an effort to boost the ranks of judges, administrators and court clerks. More than 1,100 staffers were recruited last year and 600 more will be added this year. These measures should help resolve the problem of long-running cases.
The Judicial Yuan has also promoted the establishment of specialized tribunals and recruiting more personnel with a financial background. This, too, should help get to the bottom of complex cases. Having judges with specialist knowledge, however, will not get the accused to bow their heads and admit guilt in cases where the evidence is not preserved. Such cases may become murkier, rather than clearer, as time goes on.
People who have been falsely accused may be lucky enough to have the mistake uncovered and their names cleared. But how can an investigation get back into gear when the people involved can’t be found and evidence is hard to come by? The unsolved 1997 murder of Taoyuan county commissioner Liu Pang-yu (劉邦友) and seven others is a case in point.
The investigative process also needs serious attention. Police and criminal investigators need to be more vigilant and methodical at every step of an investigation. They should not just aim for high indictment rates, which put large numbers of cases into the hands of the courts.
The courts may be the ultimate arbiters of justice, but they can only work efficiently with the support of related institutions.
Dan Chan is an associate professor of criminology at National Chung Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS