As the months roll by, the public is still waiting to hear the details of a planned economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
The benchmark TAIEX has jumped 49.2 percent this year on ample liquidity, but a sudden pullback of more than 3 percent last Monday 〞 on speculation that the government could delay signing an ECFA until next year 〞 suggested that investors were looking for an excuse to take a breather, especially considering that economic fundamentals have not motivated the high stock valuations of late.
It could also indicate that investors are watching the ECFA discussion with baited breath, even though the pact*s details remain a mystery.
The TAIEX fell 239.04 points, or 3.53 percent, to 6,530.82 on Monday, then climbed 108.59 points, or 1.66 percent, the next day following comments by Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (?欳哱) and other government figures at a meeting with business leaders. The government said preparations for inking the pact were proceeding as planned.
The fuss surrounding the ECFA has been amplified by the fact that the government has not completed a study on the potential impact or made public the content of the proposal.
It has, however, said that an ECFA would secure tax cuts from China for Taiwanese businesses, in addition to other benefits, including investment guarantees, deregulation of the service sector and protection of intellectual property rights.
Whether talks on the ECFA should be included on the agenda for the fourth round of cross-strait negotiations this year is for the government to decide. What should concern investors is not how soon the pact will be inked, but what it consists of and whether it will be implemented effectively.
Investors have overlooked the fact that the ECFA has political implications as well. In terms of discussing the ECFA with the public, the government does little more than emphasize its urgency. Investors should not be satisfied. Until the government reveals its vision for the pact, it will remain impossible to speculate on the potential positive and negative effects.
Unfortunately, Liu, Minister of Economic Affairs Yiin Chii-ming (窇??), Minister of Finance Lee Sush-der (燠扴肅), Council for Economic Planning and Development Chairman Chen Tain-jy (?氝皉) and Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Sean Chen (?喳), who attended Tuesday*s breakfast meeting with representatives of the Chinese National Association of Industry and Commerce, seem uninterested in anything but the benefits for large corporations.
Despite the government*s cheer, it remains unclear what effect an ECFA would have on domestic unemployment, small and medium-sized enterprises and local industries.
With bullish sentiment gaining momentum on the stock market following better-than-expected second-quarter reports by many US and local companies, investors should feel comfortable increasing their holdings.
They should not, however, let a vague understanding of the government*s plans for an ECFA lead them to misjudge investment priorities. The ECFA is not only a bone of contention between the two major political camps; industrial and business groups are equally divided.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under